HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bachmann, J. Articles by van der Ploeg, R. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bachmann, J. Articles by van der Ploeg, R. R. Agricola Articles by Bachmann, J. Articles by van der Ploeg, R. R.

DIVISION S-1 - SOIL PHYSICS

Isothermal and Nonisothermal Evaporation from Four Sandy Soils of Different Water Repellency

^a Institute of Soil Science, Univ. of Hannover, Herrenhaeuser Str. 2, 30419 Hannover, Germany
^b Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, Iowa 50011-1020

* Corresponding author (rhorton{at}iastate.edu)

Soil water evaporation is an important component of the surface energy balance. Evaporation also affects plant available water content of soil. Soil wettability is known to affect water-holding capacity and water flow, but the impact of soil water repellency on evaporation has not been thoroughly investigated. The objective of the study was to measure and analyze isothermal and nonisothermal evaporation rates for four sandy soils showing different degrees of water repellency. Eight vertical soil columns (two of each soil) were exposed to isothermal conditions (20 ± 1°C), and another eight soil columns were exposed to nonisothermal conditions. During the nonisothermal experiment, the top boundary temperature was held constant at 21°C, and the bottom boundary temperature was constant at 55°C, thus maintaining a constant thermal gradient. After 195 d of evaporation, each column was sectioned to determine the soil water content distribution along its axis. A numerical model based on the Philip-de Vries theory was used to predict soil water flow. Deviations between predicted and measured values increased with increasing contact angle. Isothermal cumulative evaporation was 25% lower for water repellent soil than for the most wettable soil. Nonisothermal cumulative evaporation was 75% larger than isothermal evaporation for the wettable soil but only 14% larger than isothermal evaporation of the most water repellent soil. Evaporation and residual water contents, especially in the surface layer, were found to be strongly affected by soil wettability.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. W. Nyhan A Seven-Year Water Balance Study of an Evapotranspiration Landfill Cover Varying in Slope for Semiarid Regions Vadose Zone J., June 9, 2005; 4(3): 466 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Bachmann, R. Horton, T. Ren, and R. R. van der Ploeg Comparison of the thermal properties of four wettable and four water-repellent soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2001; 65(6): 1675 - 1679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]