HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schillinger, W. F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Schillinger, W. F. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Schillinger, W. F. Related Collections Soil Erosion Soil Conservation Other Soil Management

DIVISION S-6—SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Minimum and Delayed Conservation Tillage for Wheat–Fallow Farming

Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State Univ., P.O. Box B, Lind, WA 99341

* Corresponding author (schillw{at}wsu.edu)

Maintaining crop residue, clods, and roughness on the soil surface during summer fallow is critical for wind erosion control in the low-precipitation (<300 mm annual) dryland wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production region of the inland Pacific Northwest, USA. Conventional farming practices are intensive, involving eight or more tillage operations during the fallow cycle. My objective was to evaluate fallow conservation tillage management systems for soil water storage, residue retention, surface and subsurface soil cloddiness, surface roughness, wheat stand establishment, and grain yield during 6 yr at Lind, WA. The soil is a Shano silt loam (coarse-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Xeric Haplocambids). Treatments were (i) conventional (tillage), (ii) minimum (herbicides and tillage), and (iii) delayed minimum (herbicides and delayed tillage). Averaged over years, precipitation storage efficiency in the soil was 51, 54, and 57% over winter, and 24, 26, and 26% at the end of the fallow cycle, for conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT), and delayed minimum tillage (DMT), respectively. Surface residue and surface clod mass were consistently reduced by 45% or more in CT compared with MT and DMT. There were no differences among treatments in seed-zone water content at time of sowing in September nor in grain yield in any year or when averaged across years. Results show that the long-term practice of minimum and delayed minimum tillage during fallow significantly increased surface residue and clod retention for erosion control with no adverse agronomic affects compared with conventional tillage.

Abbreviations: CT, conventional tillage • DMT, delayed minimum tillage • MT, minimum tillage • SE, precipitation storage efficiency

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. F. Schillinger and R. I. Papendick Then and Now: 125 Years of Dryland Wheat Farming in the Inland Pacific Northwest Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(Supplement_3): S-166 - S-182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. F. Schillinger and D. L. Young Cropping Systems Research in the World's Driest Rainfed Wheat Region Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1182 - 1187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Juergens, D. L. Young, W. F. Schillinger, and H. R. Hinman Economics of Alternative No-Till Spring Crop Rotations in Washington's Wheat-Fallow Region Agron. J., January 1, 2004; 96(1): 154 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Janosky, D. L. Young, and W. F. Schillinger Economics of Conservation Tillage in a Wheat-Fallow Rotation Agron. J., May 1, 2002; 94(3): 527 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]