SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bronson, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Torbert, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bronson, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Torbert, H. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bronson, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Torbert, H. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Soil Analysis
Soil Science Society of America Journal 65:1153-1163 (2001)
© 2001 Soil Science Society of America


DIVISION S-4—SOIL FERTILITY & PLANT NUTRITION

Nitrogen Response in Cotton as Affected by Tillage System and Irrigation Level

K. F. Bronson*,a, A. B. Onkena, J. W. Keelinga, J. D. Bookera and H. A. Torbertb

a Texas A&M Univ. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, RR 3, Box 219, Lubbock, TX 79401
b Grassland Soil & Water Research Lab., USDA-ARS, Temple, TX 76502

* Corresponding author (k-bronson{at}tamu.edu)

More than 0.5 million ha of irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) are grown in the Southern High Plains of Texas. Conservation tillage cotton in terminated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) has been shown to improve water use efficiency and reduce wind erosion. However, limited N fertilizer response research has been done in this system. The objective of this 3-yr field study at Lubbock, TX was to characterize the response to N fertilizer (0, 28, 56, 84, or 112 kg N ha-1) at varying irrigation levels [0, 25, 50, or 75 % Evapotranspiration (ET) replacement] for conventional and conservation tillage cotton in an Acuff loam (fine loamy, mixed, superactive, thermic, Aridic Paleustoll). Additionally, we tested the chlorophyll meter as an indicator of in-season N status of cotton and compared it to petiole NO3–N analysis. Cotton lint yields showed a quadratic response to irrigation level in 1996 and 1997, and a linear response in the drought year of 1998. Maximum lint yield varied from 71 to 97 % ET replacement. In 1997 and 1998, cotton lint yields responded to N at the 50 and 75% estimated ET replacement irrigation levels, but not at the 0 or 25% ET levels. Quadratic-plateau models indicated that 19 to 38 kg N additional fertilizer ha-1 was needed to produce economically optimum lint yields near 1100 kg N ha-1 with conservation tillage than with conventional tillage. Chlorophyll meter and petiole NO3–N readings were positively related to N rate but were not affected by tillage system.

Abbreviations: ET, evapotranspiration • PET, potential evapotranspiration




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D.G. Sullivan, J.N. Shaw, A. Price, and E. van Santen
Spectral Reflectance Properties of Winter Cover Crops in the Southeastern Coastal Plain
Agron. J., November 6, 2007; 99(6): 1587 - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
K. S. Balkcom, D. W. Reeves, J. N. Shaw, C. H. Burmester, and L. M. Curtis
Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality from Irrigated Tillage Systems in the Tennessee Valley
Agron. J., April 11, 2006; 98(3): 596 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
K. F. Bronson, J. D. Booker, J. P. Bordovsky, J. W. Keeling, T. A. Wheeler, R. K. Boman, M. N. Parajulee, E. Segarra, and R. L. Nichols
Site-Specific Irrigation and Nitrogen Management for Cotton Production in the Southern High Plains
Agron. J., January 5, 2006; 98(1): 212 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. J. Boquet, R. L. Hutchinson, and G. A. Breitenbeck
Long-Term Tillage, Cover Crop, and Nitrogen Rate Effects on Cotton: Yield and Fiber Properties
Agron. J., September 1, 2004; 96(5): 1436 - 1442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. J. Boquet, R. L. Hutchinson, and G. A. Breitenbeck
Long-Term Tillage, Cover Crop, and Nitrogen Rate Effects on Cotton: Plant Growth and Yield Components
Agron. J., September 1, 2004; 96(5): 1443 - 1452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
K. F. Bronson, T. M. Zobeck, T. T. Chua, V. Acosta-Martinez, R. S. van Pelt, and J. D. Booker
Carbon and Nitrogen Pools of Southern High Plains Cropland and Grassland Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2004; 68(5): 1695 - 1704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
T. T. Chua, K. F. Bronson, J. D. Booker, J. W. Keeling, A. R. Mosier, J. P. Bordovsky, R. J. Lascano, C. J. Green, and E. Segarra
In-Season Nitrogen Status Sensing in Irrigated Cotton: I. Yields and Nitrogen-15 Recovery
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2003; 67(5): 1428 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
K. F. Bronson, T. T. Chua, J. D. Booker, J. W. Keeling, and R. J. Lascano
In-Season Nitrogen Status Sensing in Irrigated Cotton: II. Leaf Nitrogen and Biomass
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2003; 67(5): 1439 - 1448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
H. Li, R. J. Lascano, J. Booker, L. T. Wilson, K. F. Bronson, and E. Segarra
State-Space Description of Field Heterogeneity: Water and Nitrogen Use in Cotton
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2002; 66(2): 585 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Soil Science Society of America.