HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sirjacobs, D. Articles by Levy, G.J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sirjacobs, D. Articles by Levy, G.J. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Sirjacobs, D. Articles by Levy, G.J. Related Collections Flow Other Soil Management Soil Erosion

DIVISION S-6 - SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Flow Interruption Effects on Intake Rate and Rill Erosion in Two Soils

Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, P.O. Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel

Corresponding author (vwguy{at}volcani.agri.gov.il)

Efficiency of surface irrigation is often low because of poor infiltration uniformity, resulting from relatively long periods of infiltration at the upstream end and short periods of infiltration at the downstream end of the field. Surge irrigation, the intermittent supply of water to furrows, generally reduces soil intake rate (IR) and improves moisture uniformity over the entire field. However, IR reduction varies from one irrigation scheme to another, depends on soil and water properties, and is difficult to predict. A laboratory study using miniflumes was designed to investigate the effect of interrupted flow on IR and soil loss from short rills. Two soils differing in their textures, a silt loam (Calcic Haploxeralf) derived from loess and a clay soil (Typic Haploxerert), were studied. Intake rate in the clay soil was greater than that in the silt loam. Therefore, different inflow rates were applied to the two soils to achieve similar runoff flow rates from the two soils. Cumulative infiltration decreased from 646 mL in continuous flow to 539 mL in interrupted flow for the silt loam and from 1142 to 1068 mL in the clay soil. Interrupted flow also reduced cumulative soil loss by 84% in the clay soil but had only a small effect on soil loss from the silt loam. However, when flow rate was increased from 80 to 320 mL min^-1, interrupted flow reduced soil loss in the silt loam as much as in the clay soil. Consolidation of the soil surface and formation of cohesive forces between soil particles of the silt loam with unstable structure during flow interruption was suggested as the explanation for the effect of flow interruption on intake rate and soil detachment. These results need to be verified in field experiments.

Abbreviations: HC, hydraulic conductivity • IR, intake rate

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. F. Vance, L. A. King, and G. K. Ganjegunte Soil and Plant Responses from Land Application of Saline-Sodic Waters: Implications of Management J. Environ. Qual., September 2, 2008; 37(5_Supplement): S-139 - S-148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Lado, M. Ben-Hur, and I. Shainberg Soil Wetting and Texture Effects on Aggregate Stability, Seal Formation, and Erosion Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2004; 68(6): 1992 - 1999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]