SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fritton, D.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fritton, D.D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fritton, D.D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Soil Physics
Right arrow Statistics
Soil Science Society of America Journal 65:678-684 (2001)
© 2001 Soil Science Society of America


DIVISION S-1 - SOIL PHYSICS

An Improved Empirical Equation for Uniaxial Soil Compression for a Wide Range of Applied Stresses

D.D. Fritton

Dep. of Agronomy, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802

Corresponding author (ddf{at}psu.edu)

The response of soil to compaction forces is nonlinear and not completely described by existing statistical equations. The objective of this study was to find a better empirical equation for uniaxial soil compression. Disturbed and undisturbed samples from three to five horizons of four soils, and from soil mixed with four different amounts of sand, were subjected to applied stresses ranging from 0 to 2971 kPa at one to four initial water contents. Data from individual samples representing the three resulting curve shapes were used to evaluate existing and new empirical equations. A new equation was found that fit all three curve shapes better than any of the existing equations. The new equation fit data points of representative data sets with an average difference of 0.002 to 0.009 Mg m-3, compared with an average difference for two existing equations of 0.011 to 0.033 and 0.014 to 0.060 Mg m-3. The new equation was then fit to all 120 sets of experimental data, using nonlinear regression procedures. Regression relationships were established between three parameters that have traditionally been used to characterize soil compression (preconsolidation stress, compression index, and elastic rebound/recompression parameter) and the parameters of the new equation.

Abbreviations: Ci, compression index • K, elastic rebound/recompression parameter • pC, preconsolidation stress




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
D. D. Fritton
Fitting Uniaxial Soil Compression Using Initial Bulk Density, Water Content, and Matric Potential
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 21, 2006; 70(4): 1262 - 1271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Soil Science Society of America.