|
|
||||||||
Toyama Agricultural Research Center, Soils and Fertilizer Section, 1124-1 Yoshioka, Toyama, 939-8153, Japan
Corresponding author (shigeru{at}agri.pref.toyama.jp)
Several zero-order models for estimating gross N mineralization rate (M) using 15N have been proposed. In a comparison of the Ms estimated with some experimentally determined values, different models sometimes gave substantially different results. Although the Ms are estimated by using changes in NH4N (NH414N + NH415N) and NH415N, a comprehensive comparison based on model equations is lacking. I compared four zero-order models to clarify the extent of the difference in estimated Ms between models under different conditions of changes in NH4N and NH415N. The ratio of M by one model equation to M by another is expressed by
and
, where AT is NH4N, AL is NH415N, and the subscripts 1 and 2 denote the initial and final values, respectively. Ranges of R and r are R > 0 and 0 < r < 1, respectively, and R > r. The farther r is from 1, the more different the estimated Ms are. Estimation of M must be done with caution when r
0.2 since model differences increase uncertainties in estimates.
Abbreviations: C, NH4N consuming rate I, gross N immobilization rate M, gross N mineralization rate
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||