SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, S.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, S.
Soil Science Society of America Journal 65:244-246 (2001)
© 2001 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-8-NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT & SOIL & PLANT ANALYSIS

Comparison of Gross Nitrogen Mineralization Rates by Zero-Order Models

Shigeru Takahashi

Toyama Agricultural Research Center, Soils and Fertilizer Section, 1124-1 Yoshioka, Toyama, 939-8153, Japan

Corresponding author (shigeru{at}agri.pref.toyama.jp)

Several zero-order models for estimating gross N mineralization rate (M) using 15N have been proposed. In a comparison of the Ms estimated with some experimentally determined values, different models sometimes gave substantially different results. Although the Ms are estimated by using changes in NH4–N (NH414N + NH415N) and NH415N, a comprehensive comparison based on model equations is lacking. I compared four zero-order models to clarify the extent of the difference in estimated Ms between models under different conditions of changes in NH4–N and NH415N. The ratio of M by one model equation to M by another is expressed by and , where AT is NH4–N, AL is NH415N, and the subscripts 1 and 2 denote the initial and final values, respectively. Ranges of R and r are R > 0 and 0 < r < 1, respectively, and R > r. The farther r is from 1, the more different the estimated Ms are. Estimation of M must be done with caution when r <= 0.2 since model differences increase uncertainties in estimates.

Abbreviations: C, NH4–N consuming rate • I, gross N immobilization rate • M, gross N mineralization rate







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Soil Science Society of America.