SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:1911-1917 (2000)
© 2000 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-1-SOIL PHYSICS

A Time Domain Reflectometry Method to Measure Immobile Water Content and Mass Exchange Coefficient

Jaehoon Leea, Robert Hortona and Dan B. Jaynesb

a Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011 USA
b USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Lab., 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011 USA

rhorton{at}iastate.edu

Physical nonequilibrium of water and solute transport in soil has been reported. One of the most common mechanistic models used to describe physical nonequilibrium transport phenomena is the mobile–immobile model (MIM). Two significant parameters in the MIM are immobile water content ({theta}im) and mass exchange coefficient ({alpha}). Previously, a method for determining {theta}im and {alpha} using sequential tracers (ST) has been used to characterize solute transport. In this work, we present and evaluate a method to estimate {theta}im and {alpha} using time domain reflectometry (TDR). The TDR method was tested in laboratory experiments using three 20 cm long by 12 cm diameter undisturbed saturated soil columns. The method used TDR with an application of CaCl2 to obtain resident concentrations as a function of time. The data obtained from TDR were analyzed using a log-linear equation developed based on the ST method to estimate {theta}im and {alpha}. The {theta}im and {alpha} estimates from the TDR method were compared with the estimates from the ST method and from effluent data. A conventional inverse curve fitting method (CXTFIT) was used to estimate parameters from effluent data. The means of {theta}im/{theta} from the TDR method, ST method, and effluent data were 0.31, 0.30, and 0.26, respectively. The means of {alpha} from the TDR method, ST method, and effluent data were 0.03, 0.03, and 0.04 h-1, respectively. The values of {theta}im/{theta} and {alpha} from the TDR method were very similar to the estimates from the ST method. In all three columns, the {theta}im estimates from the TDR method were within the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the estimates from the effluent data. In two of three columns, the {alpha} estimates from the TDR method were within the 95% CI of the estimates from the effluent data. The TDR method is relatively simple, rapid, and had advantages over the ST method and conventional methods for measuring solute transport properties.

Abbreviations: BTC, breakthrough curve • CI, confidence interval • MIM, mobile–immobile model • PVC, polyvinyl chloride • ST, sequential tracers • TDR, time domain reflectometry • {alpha}, mass exchange coefficient • {theta}im, immobile water content




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J.L. Heitman, A. Gaur, R. Horton, D. B. Jaynes, and T. C. Kaspar
Field Measurement of Soil Surface Chemical Transport Properties for Comparison of Management Zones
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 12, 2007; 71(2): 529 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
A. Boivin, J. Simunek, M. Schiavon, and M. Th. van Genuchten
Comparison of Pesticide Transport Processes in Three Tile-Drained Field Soils Using HYDRUS-2D
Vadose Zone J., June 21, 2006; 5(3): 838 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. Alletto, Y. Coquet, P. Vachier, and C. Labat
Hydraulic Conductivity, Immobile Water Content, and Exchange Coefficient in Three Soil Profiles
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 21, 2006; 70(4): 1272 - 1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. Gaur, R. Horton, D. B. Jaynes, and J. L. Baker
Measured and Predicted Solute Transport in a Tile Drained Field
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., April 19, 2006; 70(3): 872 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
A. Gaur, A. Gaur, R. Horton, D. B. Jaynes, J. Lee, and S. A. Al-Jabri
Using Surface Time Domain Reflectometry Measurements to Estimate Subsurface Chemical Movement
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 539 - 543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. Lee, R. Horton, and D. B. Jaynes
The Feasibility of Shallow Time Domain Reflectometry Probes to Describe Solute Transport Through Undisturbed Soil Cores
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2002; 66(1): 53 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Soil Science Society of America.