|
|
||||||||
a Dep. of Agronomy, Purdue Univ., 1150 Lilly Hall, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1150 USA
b USDA-ARS, National Soil Erosion Research Lab., 1196 Soil Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1196 USA
destott{at}purdue.edu
Soil sealing is a severe problem worldwide. Increased runoff and decreased seedling emergence cause on- and off-site problems affecting farmers and communities. One possible soil sealing control measure is the application of polyacrylamide (PAM). Little is known about the interaction of specific PAMs with soils of differing characteristics. This study was conducted to examine the relationship between different PAMs and soils of varying characteristics. We examined PAM charge densities (CD) of 20, 30, and 40% hydrolysis with molecular weights (MW) of 6, 12, and 18 Mg mol-1. The soils used were Heiden clay (fine, smectitic, thermic Udic Haplustert), Cecil sandy loam (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludult), and Fincastle silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Aeric Epiaqualf). Polyacrylamide (20 kg ha-1) was sprayed onto the soil in liquid form. Soil material was exposed to rainfall simulation in the laboratory. Infiltration rate was used as an indicator of soil surface sealing. Polyacrylamide increased infiltration rates on all three soils relative to the control. Twenty and 30% CD PAMs performed best in maintaining high infiltration rates on Heiden clay. The 12 Mg mol-1 MW formulations worked best for Cecil sandy loam. Fincastle silt loam showed no preference for a particular PAM formulation. Polyacrylamide increased final infiltration rate by as much as 3- to 5-fold for these soils. Different PAM formulations provided differing degrees of soil protection, varying between soils. Understanding the interaction of different soils with various PAM formulations will enable PAM users to select the best PAM product for their soil conditions.
Abbreviations: CD, charge density MW, molecular weight PAM, polyacrylamide
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B.J. Lepore, A.M. Thompson, and A. Petersen Impact of polyacrylamide delivery method with lime or gypsum for soil and nutrient stabilization Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, May 1, 2009; 64(3): 223 - 231. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Young, E. A. Moran, Z. Yu, J. Zhu, and D. M. Smith Reducing Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Sandy Soils with Polyacrylamide Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 21, 2009; 73(1): 13 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. I. Mamedov, S. Beckmann, C. Huang, and G. J. Levy Aggregate Stability as Affected by Polyacrylamide Molecular Weight, Soil Texture, and Water Quality Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 29, 2007; 71(6): 1909 - 1918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Ajwa and T. J. Trout Polyacrylamide and Water Quality Effects on Infiltration in Sandy Loam Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 27, 2006; 70(2): 643 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Tang, T. Lei, J. Yu, I. Shainberg, A. I. Mamedov, M. Ben-Hur, and G. J. Levy Runoff and Interrill Erosion in Sodic Soils Treated with Dry PAM and Phosphogypsum Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 27, 2006; 70(2): 679 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Mason, C. Amrhein, C. C. Goodson, M. R. Matsumoto, and M. A. Anderson Reducing Sediment and Phosphorus in Tributary Waters with Alum and Polyacrylamide J. Environ. Qual., October 12, 2005; 34(6): 1998 - 2004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yu, T. Lei, I. Shainberg, A. I. Mamedov, and G. J. Levy Infiltration and Erosion in Soils Treated with Dry PAM and Gypsum Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2003; 67(2): 630 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||