|
|
||||||||
a Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins, CO 80523 USA
b Central Great Plains Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Akron, CO 80720 USA
c Great Plains Systems Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Ft. Collins, CO 80522 USA
gbutters{at}agsci.colostate.edu
Irrigation method is an important consideration in the management of nutrients and pesticides. A 2-yr study was undertaken to evaluate Br- and atrazine [6-chloro-N-ethyl-N'-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine] leaching following uniform spray application in a corn (Zea mays L.) field under three irrigation treatments: (i) furrow irrigation with water placement in every furrow (EF), (ii) furrow irrigation with water placement (at twice the rate) in alternate furrows (AF), and (iii) sprinkler irrigation (SP). The soil, a Fort Collins clay loam (fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Aridic Haplustalf), was ridged and furrowed for all irrigation treatments. In both years of the study, Br- movement under all three irrigation treatments was dominated by lateral flow into the ridge and/or dry furrow positions. The deepest Br- leaching was found in the SP treatment, but with irrigation scheduled at 100% of evapotranspiration (ET) in no case in either year did Br- mass below the root zone (1.2 m) exceed 3% of applied mass. Comparing the furrow irrigation treatments, applying water at twice the rate to alternative furrows neither increased nor decreased the plot averaged downward movement of Br-. Atrazine movement was largely unaffected by the type and placement of irrigation, though in each treatment the downward leaching of atrazine was much greater than expected, suggesting nonequilibrium conditions and/or movement with a mobile reactive phase. A modified version of the unsaturated flow and transport code CHAIN-2D, which included two-dimensional root water and solute uptake with partitioning of the soil water into mobile and immobile regions, accurately simulated the Br- concentration profiles. The model will be useful in evaluating management alternatives for the placement of water and chemicals that minimize losses below the root zone.
Abbreviations: AF, alternate-furrow irrigation treatment EF, every-furro irrigation treatment ET, evapotranspiration LEPA, Low Energy, Precision Application SP, sprinkler irrigation treatment
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Alavi, J. Dusek, T. Vogel, R. E. Green, and C. Ray Evaluation of Dual-Permeability Models for Chemical Leaching Assessment to Assist Pesticide Regulation in Hawaii Vadose Zone J., October 8, 2007; 6(4): 735 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fortin, E. Gagnon-Bertrand, L. Vezina, and M. Rompre Preferential Bromide and Pesticide Movement to Tile Drains under Different Cropping Practices J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2002; 31(6): 1940 - 1952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||