HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vanderborght, J. Articles by Feyen, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Vanderborght, J. Articles by Feyen, J. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Vanderborght, J. Articles by Feyen, J.

DIVISION S-1-SOIL PHYSICS

Deriving Transport Parameters from Transient Flow Leaching Experiments by Approximate Steady-State Flow Convection–Dispersion Models

Institute for Land and Water Management, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Vital Decosterstraat 102, 3000 Leuven, Belgium

jan.vanderborght{at}agr.kuleuven.ac.be

The applicability of two different steady-state flow approximations of the convection–dispersion equation (CDE) to derive transport parameters from time series of concentrations or breakthrough curves (BTCs) that are observed during transient flow leaching experiments was evaluated. In the first often-used approximation, the time coordinate was transformed to a cumulative drainage coordinate, I, assuming that the water content remained constant during the leaching experiment. In the second approximation, the time coordinate was transformed to a solute penetration depth, , assuming that the flow rate and water content remained constant with depth across the solute displacement front. Comparisons of numerical solutions of the CDE for transient flow conditions with analytical solutions of the approximate steady-state models revealed that the first approximate model underestimates the dispersion of the BTC when the water content fluctuates considerably during the leaching experiment. Alternatively, fitting this model to a BTC as a function of I results in an overestimation of the dispersion coefficient D and the dispersivity . Since the second approximate model described the simulated BTCs well, good estimates of D and were obtained when this model was fitted to a BTC as a function of . If is a function of the flow rate J_w, the fitted could be related to an effective or flux-weighted average flow rate so that the soil specific relation (J_w) could be defined.

Abbreviations: BTC, breakthrough curve • CDE, convection–dispersion equation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Vanderborght and H. Vereecken Review of Dispersivities for Transport Modeling in Soils Vadose Zone J., January 24, 2007; 6(1): 29 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Vanderborght, R. Kasteel, and H. Vereecken Stochastic Continuum Transport Equations for Field-Scale Solute Transport: Overview of Theoretical and Experimental Results Vadose Zone J., March 8, 2006; 5(1): 184 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Crescimanno and P. Garofalo Application and Evaluation of the SWAP Model for Simulating Water and Solute Transport in a Cracking Clay Soil Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 27, 2005; 69(6): 1943 - 1954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Javaux and M. Vanclooster In Situ Long-Term Chloride Transport through a Layered, Nonsaturated Subsoil. 2. Effect of Layering on Solute Transport Processes Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2004; 3(4): 1331 - 1339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Vanderborght, A. Timmerman, and J. Feyen Solute Transport for Steady-State and Transient Flow in Soils with and without Macropores Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2000; 64(4): 1305 - 1317. [Abstract] [Full Text]