HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Coppola, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Coppola, A. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Coppola, A.

DIVISION S-1-SOIL PHYSICS

Unimodal and Bimodal Descriptions of Hydraulic Properties for Aggregated Soils

Dep. of Agricultural Engineering and Agronomy, Univ. of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici (Naples), Italy

ancoppol{at}unina.it

This study was conducted to investigate the capability of bimodal approaches in describing water retention data and predicting hydraulic conductivity of 18 samples from an aggregated soil. In this soil, discontinuity in the shape of the water retention curve was encountered and explained by independent draining of the inter- and of intraaggregate pores. A single van Genuchten-type retention curve was unable to describe the observed transition between the pore systems, especially near saturation. Such behavior occurred both when optimizing (VGopt) and when fixing at the measured value (VGfix) the volumetric water content at saturation, _s. Because of the predominant effect of the shape of the retention curve near saturation upon the shape of the whole hydraulic conductivity curve, predictions of hydraulic conductivity often differed from unsaturated conductivity observations by even two orders of magnitude. To the contrary, excellent descriptions of retention data were observed when superposition of two unimodal retention curves was adopted. The first function was either a van Genuchten (VGbim) or a simple one-parameter formulation introduced by Ross and Smettem (RSbim) for describing macroporosity, while the second was in both cases a van Genuchten formulation. The agreement was especially good for higher water content values, leading to values of the coefficient of determination, R², very close to unity. The laboratory-measured unsaturated conductivity values compared more closely when bimodal approaches were used, and the predictions were frequently well within one order of magnitude of the measurements.

Abbreviations: RSbim, bimodal Ross and Smettem • VGbim, bimodal van Genuchten • VGfix, unimodal van Genuchten fixed s • VGopt, unimodal van Genuchten optimized s

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Spohrer, L. Herrmann, J. Ingwersen, and K. Stahr Applicability of Uni- and Bimodal Retention Functions for Water Flow Modeling in a Tropical Acrisol Vadose Zone J., December 16, 2005; 5(1): 48 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.-J. Park and A. J. M. Smucker Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity and Porosity within Macroaggregates Modified by Tillage Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2005; 69(1): 38 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Bitterlich, W. Durner, S. C. Iden, and P. Knabner Inverse Estimation of the Unsaturated Soil Hydraulic Properties from Column Outflow Experiments Using Free-Form Parameterizations Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2004; 3(3): 971 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Braudeau, J.-P. Frangi, and R. H. Mohtar Characterizing Nonrigid Aggregated Soil-Water Medium Using its Shrinkage Curve Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2004; 68(2): 359 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]