SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, F.J.
Right arrow Articles by Warncke, D.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, F.J.
Right arrow Articles by Warncke, D.D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, F.J.
Right arrow Articles by Warncke, D.D.
Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:774-780 (2000)
© 2000 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-8-NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT & SOIL & PLANT ANALYSIS

Soil and Crop Response to Variable-Rate Liming for Two Michigan Fields

F.J. Pierce and D.D. Warncke

Crop and Soil Sci. Dep., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824 USA

piercef{at}msu.edu

Soil pH is known to vary spatially, making variable-rate lime application attractive where soil acidity occurs. This study examined the efficacy of variable-rate lime applications based on grid sampling at various scales on soil pH and the yield of corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max L. (Merr.)] during 3 yr. Lime was applied in two fields according to five lime management strategies: lime requirement (LR) estimated from maps interpolated from soil samples obtained from 30.5-, 61-, and 91.5-m grids; LR determined for the plot; and no lime. The LR interpolations consistently underestimated and were not correlated with LR measured on each plot. Granulated lime, used to insure uniform lime application, was slow to react in the field and a lab incubation verified that it reacted much slower than agricultural lime. Changes in pH occurred in the surface 10 cm, reflecting the depth of lime incorporation by chisel plowing. Corn yield did not respond to liming in 1995 and 1996. Soybean yield in 1997 increased due to liming at the Durand field, which had a lower range of soil pH values. Normalized soybean yields at both fields followed the same linear-plateau response to pH, with soybean yields declining below a threshold pH of about 5.9. While there is need for improvements in grid sampling design, variable lime applications under all of the grid sampling scales increased soil pH above the threshold pH for soybean in these fields, resulting in an improvement compared with whole field management.

Abbreviations: LR, lime requirement




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. M. Brouder, B. S. Hofmann, and D. K. Morris
Mapping Soil pH: Accuracy of Common Soil Sampling Strategies and Estimation Techniques
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2005; 69(2): 427 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. A. Bianchini and A. P. Mallarino
Soil-Sampling Alternatives and Variable-Rate Liming for a Soybean-Corn Rotation
Agron. J., November 1, 2002; 94(6): 1355 - 1366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Soil Science Society of America.