SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (35)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schipper, L.A.
Right arrow Articles by Sparling, G.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schipper, L.A.
Right arrow Articles by Sparling, G.P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schipper, L.A.
Right arrow Articles by Sparling, G.P.
Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:300-311 (2000)
© 2000 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-6-SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Performance of Soil Condition Indicators Across Taxonomic Groups and Land Uses

L.A. Schippera and G.P. Sparlinga

a Landcare Research, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton, New Zealand

sparlingg{at}landcare.cri.nz

Information on soil conditions in New Zealand is needed to assess soil quality at a national scale. We tested a standard set of 16 primary indicators at 29 sites (0–10 cm depth) across nine soil great groups with matched examples of indigenous forest, plantation forest, pastures, and crops. Soils under indigenous forest were acidic (pH 5.5–5.7), low in Olsen P (5–14 µg cm-3), with high microbial C (814–1228 µg cm-3), respiration (1.1–1.4 µg C cm-3 h-1), total C (31.8–52.9 mg cm-3), macroporosity (9.6–11.7% v/v), and total available water (29.2–31.5% v/v). Plantation forest soils had generally similar characteristics. Pasture soils were less acidic (pH 5.3–6.9) than forest soils, but with more available P (5.5–43.0 µg cm-3), higher total C (30.7–141.5 mg cm-3), total N (2.7–9.0 mg cm-3), and mineralizable N (68–175 µg cm-3). The physical condition was similar to forest soils. Cropped soil had low total C (20–34 mg cm-3), microbial C (160–956 µg cm-3), respiration (0.29–1.33 µg C cm-3 h-1), and total available water (6.7–30.1% v/v), but high pH (5.8–7.2), Olsen P (11.2–199 µg cm-3), and bulk density (0.96–1.3 g cm-3). Principal component analysis identified outlier sites and grouped land uses independently of soil great groups. Some indicators were less useful because of high variability (unsaturated hydraulic conductivity), correlation to other indicators (microbial C) or interpretation difficulties (respiration). Overall, the standardized approach provided useful information about soil conditions on a national scale.

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance • CEC, cation-exchange capacity • CV, coefficient of variance • K-40, unsaturated conductivity at -40 kPa • PCA, principal components analysis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
B. N. Moebius-Clune, H. M. van Es, O. J. Idowu, R. R. Schindelbeck, D. J. Moebius-Clune, D. W. Wolfe, G. S. Abawi, J. E. Thies, B. K. Gugino, and R. Lucey
Long-Term Effects of Harvesting Maize Stover and Tillage on Soil Quality
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 29, 2008; 72(4): 960 - 969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. Deurer, S. Sivakumaran, S. Ralle, I. Vogeler, I. McIvor, B. Clothier, S. Green, and J. Bachmann
A New Method to Quantify the Impact of Soil Carbon Management on Biophysical Soil Properties: The Example of Two Apple Orchard Systems in New Zealand
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2008; 37(3): 915 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
F. Zvomuya, H. H. Janzen, F. J. Larney, and B. M. Olson
A Long-Term Field Bioassay of Soil Quality Indicators in a Semiarid Environment
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2008; 72(3): 683 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. C. R. de Lima, W. Hoogmoed, and L. Brussaard
Soil quality assessment in rice production systems: establishing a minimum data set.
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 623 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
L. R. Lilburne, A. E. Hewitt, G. P. Sparling, and N. Selvarajah
Soil Quality in New Zealand: Policy and the Science Response
J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2002; 31(6): 1768 - 1773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
G. P. Sparling and L. A. Schipper
Soil Quality at a National Scale in New Zealand
J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2002; 31(6): 1848 - 1857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. Sanchez-Maranon, M. Soriano, G. Delgado, and R. Delgado
Soil Quality in Mediterranean Mountain Environments: Effects of Land Use Change
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2002; 66(3): 948 - 958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. J. Brejda, D. L. Karlen, J. L. Smith, and D. L. Allan
Identification of Regional Soil Quality Factors and Indicators: II. Northern Mississippi Loess Hills and Palouse Prairie
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2000; 64(6): 2125 - 2135.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the Soil Science Society of America.