|
|
||||||||
a Soil Ecology Lab., The Ohio State Univ., 1735 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH 43210 USA
b USDAARS, Soil Drainage Research Unit, 590 Woody Hayes Dr., Columbus, OH 43210 USA
c Dep. of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 590 Woody Hayes Dr., The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210 USA
d Piketon Research and Extension Center, The Ohio State Univ., 1864 Shyville Rd., Piketon, OH 45661 USA
fausey.1{at}osu.edu
Concern about NO-3 contamination of surface waters has prompted the development of agricultural water table management systems to reduce NO-3 loss in subsurface drainage outflow by subirrigating through the existing subsurface drainage lines during the growing season and controlling off-season outflows. We hypothesized that soil N pools, crop yields, and N uptake in a corn (Zea mays L.)soybean (Glycine max.) rotation differ between subirrigation (water table at 40 cm) with controlled drainage (SI/CD) vs. subsurface drainage (SD) alone on Omulga silt loam (Aeric Fragiaqualfs). Mean microbial biomass N, potentially mineralizable N, dissolved organic N, and ammonia N were not affected by the water table management system. Mean NO-3N was not affected by the water table management system at 0- to 15-cm and 15- to 30-cm depths, but the 2-yr mean soil NO-3 concentration at the 30- to 75-cm depth was 46% lower in SI/CD compared with SD. The average corn yield was 19% greater, and the average soybean yield was 64% greater, in SI/CD plots, compared with SD. Corn N uptake was 13% greater and soybean N uptake was 62% greater with SI/CD, compared with SD. The SI/CD water table management system increased plant N uptake and reduced deep-profile NO-3 concentrations, thereby reducing the amount of NO-3 potentially available to move via drains to surface waters.
Abbreviations: C/N, carbon/nitrogen DHA, dehydrogenase enzyme activity DON, dissolved organic nitrogen MBN, microbial biomass nitrogen PMN, potentially mineralizable nitrogen SD, subsurface drainage WTM SI/CD, subirrigation/controlled drainage WTM WTM, water table management
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. J. Kladivko, G. L. Willoughby, and J. B. Santini Corn Growth and Yield Response to Subsurface Drain Spacing on Clermont Silt Loam Soil Agron. J., September 19, 2005; 97(5): 1419 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Baker, N. R. Fausey, and K. R. Islam Comparison of Soil Physical Properties under Two Different Water Table Management Regimes Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2004; 68(6): 1973 - 1981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Dinnes, D. L. Karlen, D. B. Jaynes, T. C. Kaspar, J. L. Hatfield, T. S. Colvin, and C. A. Cambardella Nitrogen Management Strategies to Reduce Nitrate Leaching in Tile-Drained Midwestern Soils Agron. J., January 1, 2002; 94(1): 153 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||