HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Caron, J. Articles by Trépanier, L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Caron, J. Articles by Trépanier, L. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Caron, J. Articles by Trépanier, L.

DIVISION S-1-SOIL PHYSICS

Field Bromide Transport under Transient-State

Monitoring with Time Domain Reflectometry and Porous Cup

^a Département des Sols et de Génie Agroalimentaire, FSAA, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada, G1K 7P4
^b Khrystal Engineering, 37, Avenue Aboulbaba El Ansari, 1004 El Menzah VI, Tunis, Tunisie

jean.caron{at}sga.ulaval.ca

The contamination of groundwater by excess fertilizer and pesticides is a problem associated with modern agricultural practices. Estimating fluxes of these contaminants to groundwater requires frequent soil water sampling. Time domain reflectometry (TDR) techniques appear well-suited to this purpose because of their potential for automation and the limited calibration work required, despite potential constraints associated with probe geometry, temperature, and the nonspecificity of the probe. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of the TDR technique with porous cup samplers for estimating solute masses and concentrations in a soil at the lysimeter scale. Potassium bromide was applied at the soil surface in a 0.91 by 0.52 m area and solute was sampled with TDR and porous cups. Recovered Br^- masses were calculated based on measured water contents and Br^- concentrations. When the solute was concentrated in the top 0 to 45 cm of soil, the biases for solute mass reached 2.6 and 5.3 times the applied mass for TDR and the porous cup samplers, respectively. As the solute spread out below this depth, the bias with the TDR technique decreased to between 1.17 and 1.27 times the applied mass, whereas for the porous cup samplers, it varied between 0.97 and 1.83 times the applied Br^- mass. Differences in soil structure appeared the most likely explanation for the bias. The study also indicates that field calibration of TDR from porous cup samplers may be difficult to achieve under transient state conditions.

Abbreviations: TDR, time domain reflectometry

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Coquet, C. Coutadeur, C. Labat, P. Vachier, M. Th. van Genuchten, J. Roger-Estrade, and J. Simunek Water and Solute Transport in a Cultivated Silt Loam Soil: 1. Field Observations Vadose Zone J., July 18, 2005; 4(3): 573 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. O. Gasser, J. Caron, R. Lagace, and M. R. Laverdiere Predicting Nitrate Leaching under Potato Crops Using Transfer Functions J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2003; 32(4): 1464 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]