SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casey, F.X.M.
Right arrow Articles by Logsdon, S.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Casey, F.X.M.
Right arrow Articles by Logsdon, S.D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Casey, F.X.M.
Right arrow Articles by Logsdon, S.D.
Soil Science Society of America Journal 63:800-806 (1999)
© 1999 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-1-SOIL PHYSICS

Comparing Field Methods that Estimate Mobile–Immobile Model Parameters

F.X.M. Caseya, D.B. Jaynesb, R. Hortona and S.D. Logsdonb

a Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011 USA
b USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Lab., 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011 USA

fxcasey{at}iastate.edu

Recent studies have used field techniques that estimate soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters. These methods utilize a tension infiltrometer to infiltrate either a single tracer or a series of tracers in order to estimate immobile water content ({theta}im) and mass exchange coefficient ({alpha}) of the mobile–immobile solute transport model. The objective of this study was to compare two single tracer methods (basic and variance) with one multiple tracer method for estimating {theta}im and {alpha} from data obtained on the same field soil location. Hydraulic conductivity (K(h0)) was also estimated using these methods. Research was done at five interrow sites in a ridge-tilled corn (Zea mays L.) field, and the soil was mapped as a Nicollet series (fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic, Aquic Hapludoll). The values of {theta}im and {alpha} estimated by the multiple tracer method compared well with previously measured values using the same technique on the same field. The {theta}im values for the multiple tracer technique were larger than values derived from the basic single tracer technique. The basic single tracer technique did not take into consideration a mass exchange between {theta}im and the mobile water domain ({theta}m). The {alpha} values were less variable for the multiple tracer method than for the single tracer-variance method. Values of immobile water fraction ({theta}im/{theta}) for the multiple and basic single tracer techniques ranged from 0.30 to 0.52 and from 0.24 to 0.35, respectively. The values of {alpha} for the multiple and single tracer-variance techniques ranged from 0.06 to 0.9 d-1 and from 0.03 to 60 d-1, respectively. The volumetric water content ({theta}) changed considerably over the course of the experiment for the estimation of {alpha} using the single tracer-variance method; thus, the assumptions of this technique were compromised. The measured values of K(h0) at the five sites ranged from 0.47 to 1.66 µm s-1. There was evidence that the basic single tracer method underestimated {theta}im and overestimated {theta}m, because this method considers {alpha} = 0 during the tracer application.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J.L. Heitman, A. Gaur, R. Horton, D. B. Jaynes, and T. C. Kaspar
Field Measurement of Soil Surface Chemical Transport Properties for Comparison of Management Zones
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 12, 2007; 71(2): 529 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1999 by the Soil Science Society of America.