SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:362-368 (1999)
© 1999 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cerdà, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cerdà, A.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cerdà, A.

Parent Material and Vegetation Affect Soil Erosion in Eastern Spain

A. Cerdà*

Dep. de Geografia, Univ. de València 22060, 46080-València, Spain

*Corresponding author (acerda{at}uv.es).

ABSTRACT

Landscapes in eastern Spain are characterized by a wide range of erosion susceptibility. We hypothesized that parent material and vegetation affect infiltration, runoff, and erosion. Sixty field rainfall simulation trials (55 mm during 1 h on 0.22–0.27 m2 plots) were carried out on soils formed on marl, clay, limestone, and sandstone parent material under three vegetation cover rates: 0 to 20 (bare), 40 to 60 (intermediate), and 80 to 100% (vegetated) in eastern Spain to test this hypothesis. Surface runoff and erosion were related to parent material and vegetation cover. Vegetation enhanced infiltration and reduced surface runoff and erosion, and their variability decreased as vegetation cover increased. For bare soils, the steady-state infiltration rates ranged from 3 to 55 mm h-1, the runoff from 0 to 83%, and the erosion rates from 0 to 3720 g m-2 h-1. On the vegetated soil, the values were 53 to 55 mm h-1, 0 to 9%, and 0 to 6 g m-2 h-1, respectively, for infiltration, runoff, and erosion rates. Runoff and erosion were greatest for marl soils (0–83% and 0–3720 g m-2 h-1, respectively) and intermediate for clay and limestone (0–46% and 0–131 g m-2 h-1). Sandstone generated negligible water and soil losses (0–7 % and 0–0.29 g m-2 h-1). The interaction of vegetation and parent material showed that, on marl soils, plant cover was the main factor preventing high runoff and erosion rates.

Received for publication July 31, 1997.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. M. Schoorl, A. Veldkamp, and J. Bouma
Modeling Water and Soil Redistribution in a Dynamic Landscape Context
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2002; 66(5): 1610 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1999 by the Soil Science Society of America.