SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:222-225 (1999)
© 1999 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (44)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Binkley, D.
Right arrow Articles by Resh, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Binkley, D.
Right arrow Articles by Resh, S. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Binkley, D.
Right arrow Articles by Resh, S. C.

Rapid Changes in Soils Following Eucalyptus Afforestation in Hawaii

Dan Binkley* and Sigrid C. Resh

Dep. of Forest Sciences, Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins, CO 80523

*Corresponding author (dan{at}cnr.colostate.edu).

ABSTRACT

Intensively managed plantations of trees occupy vast areas of the tropics. The productivity of these forests depends strongly on nutrient supply, and nutrient supply may change rapidly under intensive management regimes. We documented changes in a Hawaiian soil after 32 mo of development of a plantation of eucalyptus [Eucalyptus saligna (Sm.)]. Soil C did not change significantly (average = -23 g C m-2 yr-1 to 30 cm; 95% confidence –139 to +93 g C m-2 yr-1). This lack of change in soil C resulted from a rapid loss of older soil C derived from sugarcane (–191 g C m-2 yr-1) and a rapid gain of new soil C from eucalyptus (160 g C m-2 yr-1). Soil N declined by 19 g N m-2 yr-1 (P = 0.08), despite fertilizer additions of 31 to 70 g m-2. Large reductions in exchangeable Ca and Mg probably resulted from dissolution and leaching of residual lime from prior agricultural management. We conclude that intensive sampling regimes may detect relatively small changes in tropical forest soils, and that expectations of C accumulation in soils following afforestation may need to be reconsidered.

Received for publication March 3, 1998.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
D. Binkley, J. Kaye, M. Barry, and M. G. Ryan
First-Rotation Changes in Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in a Eucalyptus Plantation in Hawaii
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2004; 68(5): 1713 - 1719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. Rothe, K. Cromack Jr., S. C. Resh, E. Makineci, and Y. Son
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Changes Under Douglas-fir With and Without Red Alder
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2002; 66(6): 1988 - 1995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
P.S. Homann, B.T. Bormann, and J.R. Boyle
Detecting Treatment Differences in Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Resulting from Forest Manipulations
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2001; 65(2): 463 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1999 by the Soil Science Society of America.