HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Corbeels, M. Articles by Van Cleemput, O. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Corbeels, M. Articles by Van Cleemput, O. Agricola Articles by Corbeels, M. Articles by Van Cleemput, O.

Field Calibration of a Neutron Moisture Meter in Vertisols

Dep. of Soil and Water Conservation, Mekelle Univ. College, P.O. Box 231, Mekelle, Ethiopia

R. Hartmann, G. Hofman and O. Van Cleemput^*

Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, Univ. of Gent, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Gent, Belgium

*Corresponding author (Oswald.VanCleemput{at}rug.ac.be).

ABSTRACT

Accurate calculation of water use efficiency is critical in evaluating innovative crop management practices under limited moisture conditions. The use of a neutron moisture meter is advantageous where repeated, non-destructive measurements are needed, but it requires a particular calibration procedure in Vertisols. The purpose of this study was to produce a field procedure for unbiased volumetric moisture content calculations using a neutron moisture meter. Two methods of calibrating a neutron moisture meter in the field were compared. The methods differed in their soil sampling procedures. The first method employs undisturbed core and clod sampling adjacent to the access tubes. This method is destructive with respect to the access tube. The second method employs disturbed soil sampling using a screw auger a few meters from the access tubes. This method is less laborious and non-destructive. Undisturbed soil samples adjacent to the access tube are representative for the sphere of influence of the neutron moisture meter and their bulk density-moisture content relationships follow a normal one-dimensional shrinkage model. The precision of the calibration was increased by correcting for changes of bulk density with changes of water content. The two methods of calibrating gave highly significant (P < 0.001) correlation coefficients. The second calibration method, however, introduced a bias of 20% at the dry end of the moisture range. At wilting point this bias was 10%. Separate calibration equations were necessary for the different horizons of the soil. Based on the calibration with correction for bulk density effect, a polynomial function can be derived that relates neutron count ratio with gravimetric water content; thus, we assumed one-dimensional shrinkage. For volumetric moisture determinations at field level, gravimetric water content was converted to volumetric on the basis of a three-dimensional isotropic shrinkage model.

Received for publication November 26, 1997.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Fares, P. Buss, M. Dalton, A. I. El-Kadi, and L. R. Parsons Dual Field Calibration of Capacitance and Neutron Soil Water Sensors in a Shrinking-Swelling Clay Soil Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2004; 3(4): 1390 - 1399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]