HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hammer, R. D. Articles by Williams, F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hammer, R. D. Articles by Williams, F. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Hammer, R. D. Articles by Williams, F.

Evaluating Central Tendency and Variance of Soil Properties within Map Units

School of Natural Resources, 301 ABNR Bldg., University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211

Fred J. Young and Frederick Williams

*Corresponding author (hammerr{at}missouri.edu).

ABSTRACT

Users are demanding that soil surveys contain statistical information about soil and map unit properties. Numerous sampling and statistical methodologies are available, but statistical methods should be appropriate for both sampling methods and data distributions. Rigorous investigations of soil property distributions are rare, and statistical methodologies have received little attention for soil survey applications. Two hypotheses were tested: (i) frequency distributions of soil properties within map units are non-normally distributed, and (ii) variability estimates will depend on the statistical assumptions and methods. Twelve transects were randomly selected in a Boone County, Missouri soil survey map unit and 12 soil attributes were investigated from a population of 120 soil cores. Three methods were used to estimate variances: (i) simple random sampling, (ii) cluster sampling, and (ii) two-stage random sampling. Frequency distributions were significantly skewed for 11 of the soil properties. The median is an appropriate estimator of central tendency for these properties. The random sampling approach provided the samplest variances, but is conceptually questionable. Two-stage sampling is conceptually most correct, but requires dubious assumptions about population size. Non-parametric confidence intervals for variable medians were appropriate, but are wide for most properties. None of the applied assumptions and techniques are universally applicable. Statistical assumptions and methodologies should be tested across a spectrum of depositional, weathering, and land-use conditions to determine the most suitable approaches for particular user needs and soil conditions.

Contribution from the Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, Journal Series no. 12020. Research was conduct in cooperation with the USDA NRCS and the Missouri Dep. of Natural Resources.

Received for publication May 6, 1996.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. D. Tomer and D. E. James Do Soil Surveys and Terrain Analyses Identify Similar Priority Sites for Conservation? Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2004; 68(6): 1905 - 1915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Daniels, P. Delaune, P. A. Moore Jr., A. Mauromoustakos, S. L. Chapman, and J. M. Langston Soil Phosphorus Variability in Pastures: Implications for Sampling and Environmental Management Strategies J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2001; 30(6): 2157 - 2165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Shirazi, L. Boersma, P. K. Haggerty, and C. B. Johnson Spatial Extrapolation of Soil Characteristics Using Whole-Soil Particle Size Distributions J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2001; 30(1): 101 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. J. Brejda, T. B. Moorman, J. L. Smith, D. L. Karlen, D. L. Allan, and T. H. Dao Distribution and Variability of Surface Soil Properties at a Regional Scale Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2000; 64(3): 974 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				F.J. Young and R.D. Hammer Defining Geographic Soil Bodies by Landscape Position, Soil Taxonomy, and Cluster Analysis Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2000; 64(3): 989 - 998. [Abstract] [Full Text]