|
|
||||||||
Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS
*Corresponding author.
ABSTRACT
Increasing crop N use efficiency and minimizing environmental risk require an accurate assessment of N taken up by the crop from different sources. We conducted this study to: (i) compare the grain yields of corn (Zea mays L.) in monoculture and in rotation with soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]; (ii) determine the contributions of N from fertilizer, soil, and legume residue to corn in the rotation; and (iii) compare N fertilizer recovery in monoculture and in rotation. Two existing (>10 yr) irrigated corn-soybean rotation areas in Kansas were used. The soils were Crete silt loam (fine, smectitic, mesic Pachic Argiustolls) and Eudora loam (coarse-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Fluventic Hapludolls). To trace the N through the rotation, 15N microplots (2.4 m2) were established int he corn. Microplots also were established in soybean to separately follow 15N from roots + soil and shoots to corn. Crop rotation and fertilizer addition increased corn yield at both sites for two growing seasons. Averaged for 2 yr, the amount of N needed in the continuous corn to achieve yield equal to that in rotation with no N added was equivalent to 144 kg N ha-1 in the Crete silt loam and 155 kg N ha-1 in the Eudora loam. Response to N was greater on the Eudora loam, probably because of textural and organic matter differences. In the Eudora soil, significantly higher amounts of soil N were taken up at harvest by corn in rotation, whereas, in the Crete soil, corn in monoculture took up significantly higher amounts of soil N. Corn plants recovered 3 kg N ha-1 (3%) from soybean residue in the Eudora soil and 5 kg N ha-1 (14%) in the Crete soil. The main value of legume residue appears to be long-term maintenance of soil N to ensure adequate delivery to future crops.
This research was supported by a USDA-ARS cooperative agreement as part of the Midwest Evaluation Systems Area Program with the Univ. of Nebraska. Contribution No. 97-424-J from Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Manhattan, KS.
Received for publication September 10, 1997.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Khan, R. L. Mulvaney, T. R. Ellsworth, and C. W. Boast The Myth of Nitrogen Fertilization for Soil Carbon Sequestration J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1821 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. B. Stevens, R. G. Hoeft, and R. L. Mulvaney Fate of Nitrogen-15 in a Long-Term Nitrogen Rate Study: II. Nitrogen Uptake Efficiency Agron. J., June 17, 2005; 97(4): 1046 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.F. Power, R. Wiese, and D. Flowerday Managing Farming Systems for Nitrate Control: A Research Review from Management Systems Evaluation Areas J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2001; 30(6): 1866 - 1880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.A. Rotz, G. W. Roth, K. J. Soder, and R. R. Schnabel Economic and Environmental Implications of Soybean Production and Use on Pennsylvania Dairy Farms Agron. J., March 1, 2001; 93(2): 418 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||