|
|
||||||||
Plant Biology and Biogeochemistry Dep., Risø National Lab., DK-4000, Denmark
W.K. Kellogg Biological Station and Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State Univ., Hickory Corners, MI 49060-9516
*Corresponding author (robertson{at}kbs.msu.edu).
ABSTRACT
Trace gas fluxes often show temporal variability on the order of hours and accurate quantification may be difficult without continuous or near-continuous measurements. We developed an automated near-continuous trace gas analysis system (NCTGAS) to measure soil-atmosphere gas fluxes on a several-times-per-day basis. In this system, air is circulated in a closed sample loop between fully automated flow-through chambers and a photoacoustic infrared trace gas analyzer (TGA). The TGA quantifies infrared active gases at ambient levels within 2 to 3 min. We tested sensitivity, stability, and calibration of the TGA, and the ability of the NCTGAS to measure fluxes of CO2 and N2O. In addition to static tests, fluxes of CO2 and N2O were simulated by bleeding known quantities of these gases into a test chamber. Gas samples were simultaneously analyzed by TGA and removed for independent analysis of CO2 by conventional infrared gas analysis and for N2O by gas chromatography. The TGA-based flux measurements were statistically identical to the independent measurements of both CO2 and N2O. In situ fluxes of CO2 and N2O measured by the NCTGAS were 105 ± 6 and 93 ± 10%, respectively, of those measured from hand-drawn samples. The TGA was as or more stable than conventional means for measuring CO2 and N2O in air at ambient concentrations, and was equally sensitive across the range of concentrations normally encountered in field measurements. Fast response time and ease of use offers significant advantages over conventional gas chromatography.
Received for publication December 19, 1996.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. B. Parkin Effect of Sampling Frequency on Estimates of Cumulative Nitrous Oxide Emissions J. Environ. Qual., June 23, 2008; 37(4): 1390 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. E. Turcu, S. B. Jones, and D. Or Continuous Soil Carbon Dioxide and Oxygen Measurements and Estimation of Gradient-Based Gaseous Flux Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 1161 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Parkin and T. C. Kaspar Temporal Variability of Soil Carbon Dioxide Flux: Effect of Sampling Frequency on Cumulative Carbon Loss Estimation Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2004; 68(4): 1234 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Parkin and T. C. Kaspar Temperature Controls on Diurnal Carbon Dioxide Flux: Implications for Estimating Soil Carbon Loss Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2003; 67(6): 1763 - 1772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Pedersen, S. O. Petersen, and F. P. Vinther Stochastic Diffusion Model for Estimating Trace Gas Emissions with Static Chambers Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2001; 65(1): 49 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||