SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:257-262 (1998)
© 1998 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zellis, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Prunty, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zellis, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Prunty, L.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zellis, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Prunty, L.

Soil Water Content Determination by Karl Fischer Titration

M. K. Zellis, J. S. Bell and Lyle Prunty*

Department of Soil Science, North Dakota State Univ., P.O. Box 5638, Fargo, ND 58105

*Corresponding author (prunty{at}plains.nodak.edu).

ABSTRACT

Karl Fischer (KF) titration is a specific analysis for water content. We hypothesized that it may be useful in soils where volatiles besides water are present, since oven drying (OD) determines total volatile components, not water content specifically. We examined KF titration as a technique for soil water content determination. Two soils (a quartz sand separate and Barnes loam [fine-loamy, mixed Udic Haploboroll]) were prepared with varying known amounts of water (0–240 g kg–1) and a non-aqueous-phase liquid (NAPL), either octane or toluene (0–128 g kg–1), then analyzed for water content using both the OD and KF methods. The experimental matrix included all six possible combinations of two soils x three liquids. Soil water contents determined by the calibrated KF method (wc) compared favorably to those determined by OD (wo). Slopes for the six wc vs. wo regressions ranged from 0.980 to 1.009 while intercepts ranged from –0.6 to 7.8 g kg–1. Mean r2 was 0.97 with a range of 0.93 to 0.99. The sand with octane and sand with toluene mixtures had intercepts of 6.1 ± 2.5 and 7.8 ± 5.4 g kg–1 (95% confidence intervals), respectively. All other intercept confidence intervals included zero. Plots of the data show essentially a 1:1 correspondence of wc to wo. Variability was greater when toluene was present, possibly because of toluene's higher vapor pressure.


NOTES

Contribution of the North Dakota Agric. Exp. Stn.

Received for publication September 9, 1996.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1998 by the Soil Science Society of America.