SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:1730-1737 (1997)
© 1997 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rahman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Arneson, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rahman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Arneson, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rahman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Arneson, C.

Wyoming Rocky Mountain Forest Soils: Mapping Using an ARC/INFO Geographic Information System

S. Rahman

Soil Science Division, Agricultural Research Inst., Peshawar (NWFP), Pakistan

L. C. Munn* and G. F. Vance

Dep. of Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences

C. Arneson

Wyoming Water Resources Center, Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071

* Corresponding author ( gfv{at}uwyo.edu).

ABSTRACT

In the western USA, wildland soil survey areas are often large, and the resources of money, personnel, and time required for conventional soil survey techniques are in short supply. We evaluated an alternative methodology for producing soil maps through a process of transecting, model construction, and projection onto a map base using ARC/INFO geographic information system (GIS) technology. We conducted this study in the Libby Creek watershed in Wyoming where soil distribution (Cryoboralfs, Cryoborolls, Cryaquolls, Cryaquents, Cryochrepts, and Cryorthents) is a function of geology, slope stability, and vegetation. The GIS-generated soils map was compared with existing general (Order 4) and detailed (Order 3) soils maps prepared for the U.S. Forest Service (USFS). Discrepancies noted between the GIS-generated map and USFS maps included: Cryochrepts were the dominant soil on the GIS map (44%), but comprised only 15% on the USFS detailed soils map; Cryumbrepts occupied 19% of the USFS general soils map but only 2% on the GIS-derived soils map; and no Cryumbrepts were delineated in the study area on the USFS detailed soils map. Only two of the eight Cryumbrepts sampled occurred within Cryumbrept delineations on the USFS general soils map. Of the 37 pedons sampled and classified along the five transects across Libby Creek watershed, 11 (30%) corresponded to named soils of mapping units in the USFS general soils map, and 20 (54%) coincided on the USFS detailed soils map. Results of this study suggest transecting and GIS-based mapping can be an effective technique for producing general soils maps, and can aid in placing soil boundaries for detailed soils maps.

Received for publication February 5, 1996.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
C. E. Johnson, J. J. Ruiz-Méndez, and G. B. Lawrence
Forest Soil Chemistry and Terrain Attributes in a Catskills Watershed
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2000; 64(5): 1804 - 1814.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the Soil Science Society of America.