SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:1116-1121 (1997)
© 1997 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castillo, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Albaladejo, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Castillo, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Albaladejo, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Castillo, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Albaladejo, J.

Runoff and Soil Loss Response to Vegetation Removal in a Semiarid Environment

V. M. Castillo*, M. Martinez-Mena and J. Albaladejo

Department of Soil and Water Conservation, CEBAS-CSIC, P.O. Box 4195, E30080-Murcia, Spain

*Corresponding author (victor{at}natura.cebas.csic.es).

ABSTRACT

The removal of vegetation is the main cause of soil degradation in semiarid areas. We hypothesized that the changes in soil properties induced by vegetation removal modified the runoff and soil erosion response in a semiarid area of Spain. To test this, two plots (15 by 5 m) were installed on a 23% slope on a Lithic Haploxeroll. Vegetation was removed by clipping from one of the plots (Plot D) and the changes in surface runoff and soil loss were compared with an undisturbed control plot (Plot N) from 1989 to 1993. Total runoff was significantly greater in Plot D (48.8 mm) than in Plot N (34.9 mm). Runoff ratios between the disturbed and natural plots increased with time from 1.4:1 in 1990 to 2.5:1 in 1993. Vegetation removal increased the soil losses in Plot D (150.2 g m–2) by 127% compared with those in Plot N (66.3 g m–2). The annual soil loss ratio between the disturbed and natural plots increased from 1.6:1 in 1989 to 4.2:1 in 1993. The observed increase in surface runoff and soil loss was attributed to a progressive deterioration of soil physical properties in Plot D. Bulk density increased by 8.4% (from 1.55 to 1.68 Mg m–3) and a reduction of total organic carbon (from 4.0 to 2.6%) and the percentage of stable aggregates (from 81.6 to 56.3%) were observed. There was no evidence of vegetation recovery, suggesting that reduced vegetal cover might lead to irreversible soil degradation in semiarid areas.

Received for publication March 26, 1996.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
E. Wang, C. Xin, J. R. Williams, and C. Xu
Predicting Soil Erosion for Alternative Land Uses
J. Environ. Qual., February 2, 2006; 35(2): 459 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
N. G. Fierer and E. J. Gabet
Carbon and Nitrogen Losses by Surface Runoff following Changes in Vegetation
J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2002; 31(4): 1207 - 1213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the Soil Science Society of America.