SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:877-883 (1997)
© 1997 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by da Silva, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kay, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by da Silva, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kay, B. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by da Silva, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kay, B. D.

Estimating the Least Limiting Water Range of Soils from Properties and Management

Alvaro Pires da Silva*

Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultural Luiz de Queiroz, Dep. de Ciência do Solo, Bolsista do CNPq, Piracicaba-SP 13418-900, Brazil

B. D. Kay

Dep. of Land Resource Science, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada

*Corresponding author (apisilva{at}carpa.ciagri.usp.br).

ABSTRACT

The least limiting water range, LLWR, is the range of soil water content within which plant growth is least limited by water potential, aeration, and mechanical resistance. Little information is available on the influence of soil property or management practice on LLWR. The LLWR calculation is based on the water release curve (WRC) and the soil resistance curve (SRC). This study tested the hypothesis that pedotransfer functions (PTF) that describe the influence of soil properties and tillage on the WRC and the SRC could be used to assess the influence of these factors on the LLWR. Thirty-two paired sampling sites were located along two parallel transects in a side by side comparison of no-till and conventional tillage. The transects crossed three soil types: Aquic Hapludalf, Psammentic Hapludalf, and Typic Hapludalf. Clay content (CLAY) varied from 5.8 to 37.4%, organic carbon (OC) varied from 9 to 39 g kg-1, and the bulk density (Db) varied from 0.96 to 1.71 g cm-3. Multiple regression analyses showed that WRC was related (R2 = 0.94) with CLAY, OC, and Db whereas the SRc was related with CLAY and OC (R2 = 0.86). Tillage had no independent effect in either of the two functions. Values of LLWR, calculated from the PTF, varied from 0 to 0.3093 cm3 cm-3. The LLWR was negatively related with CLAY and Db and positively related with OC. The analyses supported the hypothesis illustrating the value of PTF in assessing the sensitivity of LLWR to soil properties.

Received for publication November 10, 1995.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
Y. Zhao, M. Krzic, C. E. Bulmer, and M. G. Schmidt
Maximum Bulk Density of British Columbia Forest Soils from the Proctor Test: Relationships with Selected Physical and Chemical Properties
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 25, 2008; 72(2): 442 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
G. Yoo, T. M. Nissen, and M. M. Wander
Use of physical properties to predict the effects of tillage practices on organic matter dynamics in three illinois soils.
J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2006; 35(4): 1576 - 1583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
G. Yoo and M. M. Wander
Influence of Tillage Practices on Soil Structural Controls over Carbon Mineralization
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 27, 2006; 70(2): 651 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. G. Bengough, M. F. Bransby, J. Hans, S. J. McKenna, T. J. Roberts, and T. A. Valentine
Root responses to soil physical conditions; growth dynamics from field to cell
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2006; 57(2): 437 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
C. M. Siegel-Issem, J. A. Burger, R. F. Powers, F. Ponder, and S. C. Patterson
Seedling Root Growth as a Function of Soil Density and Water Content
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2005; 69(1): 215 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. Imhoff, A. P. Da Silva, and D. Fallow
Susceptibility to Compaction, Load Support Capacity, and Soil Compressibility of Hapludox
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2004; 68(1): 17 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
F. J. Cook and J. H. Knight
Oxygen Transport to Plant Roots: Modeling for Physical Understanding of Soil Aeration
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2003; 67(1): 20 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the Soil Science Society of America.