HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mohrath, D. Articles by Bourlet, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Mohrath, D. Articles by Bourlet, M. Agricola Articles by Mohrath, D. Articles by Bourlet, M.

Error Analysis of an Evaporation Method for Determining Hydrodynamic Properties in Unsaturated Soil

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité de Science du Sol, Domaine Saint Paul, Site Agroparc, 84914 Montfavet Cedex 9, France

*Corresponding author (laurent.bruckler{at}avignon.inra.fr).

ABSTRACT

Solving soil unsaturated flow problems requires knowledge of the water retention (h) and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity K() relationships. The purpose of this study was to investigate more thoroughly the properties and accuracy of an evaporation method described by Wind (1969) for determining (h) and K() from laboratory cores. Evaporation from a vertical column of soil was first simulated using numerical solution of Richards equation for a given set of soil hydraulic properties. The simulated data were then used to evaluate the ability of Wind's method to provide estimations of the retention and unsaturated conductivity curves when measurement errors were taken into account. The main sources of error were (i) errors due to the position of the tensiometers in the sample, (ii) errors due to the calibration of the transducers used for the pressure head measurements, and (iii) errors due to layering in the soil column. The estimated water retention curves were sensitive only to soil layering. On the other hand, small uncertainties in the position of the tensiometers (1 or 2 mm) and in the calibration curve of the transducers for the pressure head measurements (1–5%) had a great influence on the estimated hydraulic conductivity curves. A correction procedure was proposed and was satisfactory when errors of position in the tensiometers were taken into account. Results also showed that temperature corrections related to viscosity of liquid water were large. Finally, this method gives poor estimates of hydraulic conductivities when raw tensiometric data are corrupted with small errors in their position or calibration.

Received for publication October 18, 1995.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Sansoulet, Y.-M. Cabidoche, P. Cattan, S. Ruy, and J. Simunek Spatially Distributed Water Fluxes in an Andisol under Banana Plants: Experiments and Three-Dimensional Modeling Vadose Zone J., May 27, 2008; 7(2): 819 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Bruckler, P. Bertuzzi, R. Angulo-Jaramillo, and S. Ruy Testing an Infiltration Method for Estimating Soil Hydraulic Properties in the Laboratory Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2002; 66(2): 384 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Richard, J.F. Sillon, and O. Marloie Comparison of Inverse and Direct Evaporation Methods for Estimating Soil Hydraulic Properties under Different Tillage Practices Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2001; 65(1): 215 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text]