SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:390-398 (1997)
© 1997 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Assouline, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tavares-Filho, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Assouline, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tavares-Filho, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Assouline, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tavares-Filho, J.

Effect of Compaction on Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties: Experimental Results and Modeling

S. Assouline and D. Tessier*

I.N.R.A. Centre de Recherches de Versailles. Unite de science du sol, Route de St-Cyr, 78026 Versailles cedex, France

J. Tavares-Filho

Universidade Estadual de Londrina, CCA-Agronomia, Londrina, Brazil

*Corresponding author (tessier{at}versailles.inra.fr).

ABSTRACT

Soil compaction affects soil physical properties and, eventually, crop production. A severe drop in the productivity of the state of Parana, southern Brazil, was observed due to soil compaction. Two oxisols from this region, a Haplic Acrothox from the site of Cascavel and a Haplic Eutrothox from the site of Palotina, presenting different compaction behaviors in the field, are studied under laboratory conditions. Uniaxial compressive pressures, from 50 to 1000 kPa, are applied to soil samples at different initial matric potentials, varying from –0.1 to –1000 kPa. The bulk density of the Palotina soil is always higher than that of the Cascavel soil and is the highest when the initial matric tension is – 32 kPa. Differences in pH, cation-exchange capacity, organic matter, and clay particle thickness also tend to explain the different compaction behaviors. A model of the soil bulk density increase during compaction is proposed and compared with a multiplicative model and a logarithmic model. The performances of the proposed and the multiplicative models are practically similar and better than those of the logarithmic model. The major advantage of the proposed model is that it has one fitting parameter less than the multiplicative model. Compaction affects the soil water retention curves for the whole range of matric tensions, up to – 100 MPa. An approach that allows the evaluation of the hydraulic conductivity functions of the compacted samples is proposed. Applied to the Brooks and Corey relationship, the main drying curves of the compacted samples are well reproduced using one fitting parameter only.

Received for publication November 27, 1995.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
B. Augeard, L. M. Bresson, S. Assouline, C. Kao, and M. Vauclin
Dynamics of Soil Surface Bulk Density: Role of Water Table Elevation and Rainfall Duration
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 25, 2008; 72(2): 412 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
D. D. Fritton
Fitting Uniaxial Soil Compression Using Initial Bulk Density, Water Content, and Matric Potential
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 21, 2006; 70(4): 1262 - 1271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
S. Assouline
Modeling the Relationship between Soil Bulk Density and the Hydraulic Conductivity Function
Vadose Zone J., May 26, 2006; 5(2): 697 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
S. Assouline
Modeling the Relationship between Soil Bulk Density and the Water Retention Curve
Vadose Zone J., April 27, 2006; 5(2): 554 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
C. F. Stange and R. Horn
Modeling the Soil Water Retention Curve for Conditions of Variable Porosity
Vadose Zone J., July 18, 2005; 4(3): 602 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. Imhoff, A. P. Da Silva, and D. Fallow
Susceptibility to Compaction, Load Support Capacity, and Soil Compressibility of Hapludox
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2004; 68(1): 17 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. L. House, W. L. Powers, D. E. Eisenhauer, D. B. Marx, and D. Fekersillassie
Spatial Analysis of Machine-Wheel Traffic Effects on Soil Physical Properties
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2001; 65(5): 1376 - 1384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
D.D. Fritton
An Improved Empirical Equation for Uniaxial Soil Compression for a Wide Range of Applied Stresses
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2001; 65(3): 678 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the Soil Science Society of America.