SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:124-130 (1997)
© 1997 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Staben, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Staben, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Staben, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. L.

Assessment of Soil Quality in Conservation Reserve Program and Wheat-Fallow Soils

M. L. Staben, D. F. Bezdicek* and M. F. Fauci

Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

J. L. Smith

USDA-ARS, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164

*Corresponding author (bezdicek{at}wsu.edu).

ABSTRACT

Chemical and microbial aspects of soil quality are an important consideration when evaluating the benefits of soil conservation efforts such as the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of CRP and wheat-fallow (W-F) soils using soil biological and chemical parameters and C and N mineralization processes. The study was conducted on 20 CRP/W-F paired sites in eastern Washington, on Ritzville silt loam (coarse-silty, mixed, mesic Calciorthidic Haploxerolls). Soils collected from the paired fields were analyzed for chemical and biological parameters that have been suggested as indicators of soil quality. Potential enzyme activities and soil N were higher in the CRP soil than the W-F soil. Although there were no significant differences in total organic carbon (TOC) or microbial biomass carbon (MBC) the C mineralization potentials and C pools were significantly different between the CRP and W-F soils. Soil biota measurements showed there was greater active bacterial biomass in the CRP soil but greater fungal-feeding nematodes, flagellates, and amoebae in the W-F soil. The C mineralization study suggests that there is a significant increase in the secondary C pool of the CRP soil, which may indicate a buildup of higher quality soil organic matter and the potential for higher enzyme levels. When grass or straw was added to each soil type, the W-F soil produced more CO2 with either substrate than the CRP soil, indicating C limiting conditions in the W-F soil. Since it is unknown what constitutes good soil quality, these shifts in chemical and biological parameters may seem subtle. However, in general, trends in the data indicated that soil quality in the CRP was improved after 4 to 7 yr, compared with its previous management in W-F cropland.

Received for publication October 9, 1995.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. Suman, M. Lal, A. K. Singh, and A. Gaur
Microbial Biomass Turnover in Indian Subtropical Soils under Different Sugarcane Intercropping Systems
Agron. J., May 3, 2006; 98(3): 698 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
K. F. Bronson, T. M. Zobeck, T. T. Chua, V. Acosta-Martinez, R. S. van Pelt, and J. D. Booker
Carbon and Nitrogen Pools of Southern High Plains Cropland and Grassland Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2004; 68(5): 1695 - 1704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. H. Dao, J. H. Stiegler, J. C. Banks, L. B. Boerngen, and B. Adams
Post-Contract Land Use Effects on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in Conservation Reserve Grasslands
Agron. J., January 1, 2002; 94(1): 146 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
W. Amelung, J. M. Kimble, S. Samson-Liebig, and R. F. Follett
Restoration of Microbial Residues in Soils of the Conservation Reserve Program
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2001; 65(6): 1704 - 1709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. R. Huggins, G. W. Randall, and M. P. Russelle
Subsurface Drain Losses of Water and Nitrate following Conversion of Perennials to Row Crops
Agron. J., May 1, 2001; 93(3): 477 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L.A. Schipper and G.P. Sparling
Performance of Soil Condition Indicators Across Taxonomic Groups and Land Uses
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2000; 64(1): 300 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M.M. Wander and G.A. Bollero
Soil Quality Assessment of Tillage Impacts in Illinois
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 1999; 63(4): 961 - 971.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the Soil Science Society of America.