SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1686-1696 (1996)
© 1996 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hart, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lowery, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hart, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lowery, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hart, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lowery, B.

Partitioned Flow Domains of Three Wisconsin Soils

G. L. Hart and B. Lowery*

Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, 1525 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706-1299

*Corresponding author (lowery{at}calshp.cals.wisc.edu).

ABSTRACT

Preferential flow mechanisms have been the subject of increasing research interest because these phenomena contribute to solute transport. Commonly, preferential flow paths are associated with macropores or highly structured soils. Sandy soils are typically weakly structured or structureless. However, they exhibit rapid drainage, which may mimic the hydrology and solute transport effects of macropores. We tested whether a flow domain partitioning scheme could be applied on two sandy soils, by collecting drainage data with time domain reflectometry across small time increments and implementing analytical models using a nonlinear iterative fitting procedure. The analysis was applied to both observed and Leaching Estimation and Chemistry Water Model (LEACHW) drainage of Sparta (mesic, uncoated, Typic Quartzipsamments) and Plainfield sand (mixed, mesic, Typic Udipsamment), as well as strongly structured Dubuque silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic, Typic Hapludalf), where water content was measured with a neutron meter. We found significant differences (P < 0.05) between soils and profile depths relating macropore and matrix flow domains of observed data. Maximum hydrologically effective macropore volumes ranged from 0.018 (1.8%) in Dubuque silt loam to 0.294 (29.4%) in Sparta sand. Mixed results were obtained with flow domain partitioning of drainage simulated with LEACHW. In 5 of 15 cases, macropore and micropore parameter estimates failed to converge. Best agreement of micropore and macropore parameter estimates between observed and modeled drainage was observed in Dubuque soil and poorest concordance in Sparta sand. This analytical scheme may be applied to a wide range of soils if appropriate data describing the hydrological character were available.


NOTES

Research supported by USDA-ARS Management System Evaluation Area and Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.

Received for publication April 17, 1995.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
H. H. Gerke and J. M. Kohne
Estimating Hydraulic Properties of Soil Aggregate Skins from Sorptivity and Water Retention
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2002; 66(1): 26 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1996 by the Soil Science Society of America.