|
|
||||||||
Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0C6
*Corresponding author (reynoldsd{at}ncccot.agr.ca).
ABSTRACT
Infiltration, drainage, and chemical leaching are strongly influenced by the magnitude and spatial distribution of the field-saturated soil hydraulic conductivity (Kfs). The Guelph permeameter (GP) method shows promise as an effective means for field measurement of Kfs and its spatial distribution, but its accuracy in medium- and fine-textured soils is not well established. To further assess its accuracy and effectiveness, the GP method was compared with the auger hole (AH) method at the 0.5-m depth at 68 grid locations in a texturally uniform silty clay soil that had stable but spatially variable structure. The two methods yielded similar geometric mean Kfs values (P < 0.001), as well as similar semivariograms. The two methods were also positively correlated (r = + 0.6565, P < 0.0001). We therefore concluded that the two methods gave equivalent estimates of Kfs at this field site, and that the GP method is capable of providing valid estimates of Kfs in at least some fine-textured soils. The Kfs values were not correlated with soil texture, organic C content, or soil surface topography, but were negatively correlated (r = –0.7240 for GP method, r = –0.6070 for AH method, P < 0.0001) with antecedent volumetric water content (
a) measured in situ prior to the GP measurements using a down-hole time domain reflectometry probe. The semivariogram for
a was similar to those for Kfs. These results suggest that the magnitude, range, and pattern of variability of the Kfs measurements were controlled primarily by the well-developed and stable soil structure at the field site, rather than by texture, organic C content, or surface topography.
Received for publication October 5, 1995.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Bagarello, M. Iovino, and D. Elrick A Simplified Falling-Head Technique for Rapid Determination of Field-Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2004; 68(1): 66 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ersahin Comparing Ordinary Kriging and Cokriging to Estimate Infiltration Rate Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2003; 67(6): 1848 - 1855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Bagarello, M. Iovino, and G. Tusa Factors Affecting Measurement of the Near-Saturated Soil Hydraulic Conductivity Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2000; 64(4): 1203 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||