SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1552-1558 (1996)
© 1996 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Droogers, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bouma, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Droogers, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bouma, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Droogers, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bouma, J.

Biodynamic vs. Conventional Farming Effects on Soil Structure Expressed by Simulated Potential Productivity

P. Droogers* and J. Bouma

Department of Soil Science and Geology, Agricultural Univ., P.O. Box 37, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands

*Corresponding author (peter.droogers{at}oio.beng.wau.nl).

ABSTRACT

Effects of alternative farming systems on soil structure need to be quantified to judge the sustainability of the systems. This study was conducted to compare two farming systems by converting "static" basic soil properties into a "dynamic" assessment using simulation modeling. Increasingly popular biodynamic farming systems use no commercial fertilizers and pesticides but apply organic manure and compost. Soil conditions on four fields on two farms where biodynamic and conventional soil management had been practiced for about 70 yr were investigated with morphological and physical methods. Soils (Loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Fluvaquents) were pedologically identical. Four procedures were used to express differences in soil structure as a function of different management: (i) morphological description; (ii) measurement of basic and static soil parameters such as bulk density, organic matter, and porosity; (iii) measurement of soil hydraulic characteristics; and (iv) determination of simulated water-limited yields. The latter procedure provides a criterion that is quantitative, is directly related to a practical aspect of soil behavior, and reflects the highly nonlinear soil-water processes. The WAVE simulation model was used to predict water-limited potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yields with climatic data of 30 yr. Basic static soil parameters were not significantly different but simulated yields were significantly different and were 10 200 and 10 300 vs. 9400 and 9700 kg dry matter tuber yield ha–1 yr–1 for the biodynamic and the conventional fields, respectively. Simulation modeling of crop yields thus provides a relevant expression for the production potential of the two different farming systems.


NOTES

This study was supported by the Netherlands Geosciences Foundation (GOA) with financial aid from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

Received for publication June 26, 1995.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
K. A. Oquist, J. S. Strock, and D. J. Mulla
Influence of Alternative and Conventional Management Practices on Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties
Vadose Zone J., March 8, 2006; 5(1): 356 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. Carpenter-Boggs, A.C. Kennedy, and J.P. Reganold
Organic and Biodynamic Management: Effects on Soil Biology
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2000; 64(5): 1651 - 1659.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1996 by the Soil Science Society of America.