SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1318-1326 (1996)
© 1996 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chanzy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Judge, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chanzy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Judge, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chanzy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Judge, A.

Soil Water Content Determination Using a Digital Ground-Penetrating Radar

A. Chanzy*

INRA, Laboratoire de Science du Sol, Domaine St-Paul, 84914 Avignon Cédex 09, France

A. Tarussov and F. Bonn

Centre d'applications et de recherches en télédétection (CARTEL), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K 2R1

A. Judge

Terrain Sciences Division, Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0E8

*Corresponding author (achanzy{at}avignon.inra.fr).

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the potential of a digital ground-penetrating radar (GPR) for soil moisture determination. Ground-penetrating radar offers a fast and nondestructive way for estimating the soil dielectric constant and may be an interesting tool for low-cost mapping of soil moisture. Two modes of operation were considered: (i) the ground mode where signal propagation between the antennas placed on the surface was studied; (ii) the airborne mode where the antennas are raised 5–15 m above the soil surface. Variables describing the GPR response were defined and related to the soil moisture. It is shown from field experiments that the GPR measurements performed at 200 MHz in both modes are mainly affected by the moisture in the 10- to 20-cm topsoil layer. In the ground mode, the obtained soil moisture error after calibration was lower than 0.03 m3/m3. In the airborne mode, soil moisture estimations were less accurate (0.046 m3/m3). The wave spreading loss characterization has to be improved to get an altitude-independent GPR measurement.

Received for publication September 5, 1994.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
D. A. Robinson, C. S. Campbell, J. W. Hopmans, B. K. Hornbuckle, S. B. Jones, R. Knight, F. Ogden, J. Selker, and O. Wendroth
Soil Moisture Measurement for Ecological and Hydrological Watershed-Scale Observatories: A Review
Vadose Zone J., February 25, 2008; 7(1): 358 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
L. W. Galagedara, J. D. Redman, G. W. Parkin, A. P. Annan, and A. L. Endres
Numerical Modeling of GPR to Determine the Direct Ground Wave Sampling Depth
Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 1096 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
S. Lambot, J. Rhebergen, I. van den Bosch, E. C. Slob, and M. Vanclooster
Measuring the Soil Water Content Profile of a Sandy Soil with an Off-Ground Monostatic Ground Penetrating Radar
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2004; 3(4): 1063 - 1071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
J. A. Huisman, J. A. Huisman, S. S. Hubbard, J. D. Redman, and A. P. Annan
Measuring Soil Water Content with Ground Penetrating Radar: A Review
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 476 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
G. Serbin and D. Or
Near-Surface Soil Water Content Measurements Using Horn Antenna Radar: Methodology and Overview
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 500 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
J. A. Huisman, J. J. J. C. Snepvangers, W. Bouten, and G. B. M. Heuvelink
Monitoring Temporal Development of Spatial Soil Water Content Variation: Comparison of Ground Penetrating Radar and Time Domain Reflectometry
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 519 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. R. Butnor, J. A. Doolittle, K. H. Johnsen, L. Samuelson, T. Stokes, and L. Kress
Utility of Ground-Penetrating Radar as a Root Biomass Survey Tool in Forest Systems
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2003; 67(5): 1607 - 1615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. E. Kruse and H. M. Jol
Amplitude analysis of repetitive GPR reflections on a Lake Bonneville delta, Utah
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2003; 211(1): 287 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1996 by the Soil Science Society of America.