|
|
||||||||
Research and Development Division, International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC), P.O. Box 2040, Muscle Shoals, AL 35662
*Corresponding author (ifdc.research{at}cgnet.com).
ABSTRACT
Quantitative estimation of the enhancement effect of water-soluble P on P availability from phosphate rock (PR) has not been reported. The objective of this study was to use radioactive 32P as a tracer to distinguish P availability from soil, PR, and TSP so that P uptake by crops from PR in the presence of TSP could be estimated. Three sets of 4-kg soil samples of an acid Hartsells silt loam (fine-loamy, siliceous, thermic Typic Hapludult, pH 4.8) were mixed with the following treatments: (i) 32P solution and central Florida PR (CFPR), (ii) 32P-tagged TSP, and (iii) 32P-tagged TSP and CFPR at a P ratio of 50:50. The rates of P applied were 0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, and 200 mg P kg–1. For treatment (iii), an additional rate of 400 mg P kg–1 was also prepared. Maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp. ssp. unguiculata) were planted and harvested at 42 d after planting for maize and 45 d for cowpea. The effectiveness of P sources in terms of increasing dry-matter yield and P uptake followed the order of TSP >- (CFPR + TSP) > CFPR for maize and TSP = (CFPR + TSP) > CFPR for cowpea. Phosphorus uptake from CFPR in the presence of TSP was higher than P uptake from CFPR applied alone, indicating an enhancement effect of TSP on the effectiveness of CFPR. The increase in P uptake from CFPR due to TSP influence, across all the PR rates applied, was 3.48 mg P pot–1 for maize and 1.38 mg P pot–1 for cowpea. With respect to P uptake from CFPR applied alone, the corresponding relative increase in P uptake from CFPR due to TSP influence was 165% for maize and 72% for cowpea.
Received for publication May 12, 1995.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. I. Prochnow, S. H. Chien, G. Carmona, E. F. Dillard, J. Henao, and E. R. Austin Plant Availability of Phosphorus in Four Superphosphate Fertilizers Varying in Water-Insoluble Phosphate Compounds Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 25, 2008; 72(2): 462 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. I. Prochnow, S. H. Chien, G. Carmona, and J. Henao Greenhouse Evaluation of Phosphorus Sources Produced from a Low-Reactive Brazilian Phosphate Rock Agron. J., May 1, 2004; 96(3): 761 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. I. Prochnow, S. H. Chien, E. F. Dillard, E. R. Austin, G. Carmona, J. Henao, U. Singh, and R. W. Taylor Synthesis, Characterization, and Agronomic Evaluation of Iron Phosphate Impurities in Superphosphates Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2003; 67(5): 1551 - 1563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. I. Prochnow, S. H. Chien, R. W. Taylor, G. Carmona, J. Henao, and E. F. Dillard Characterization and Agronomic Evaluation of Single Superphosphates Varying in Iron Phosphate Impurities Agron. J., March 1, 2003; 95(2): 293 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||