HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mallants, D. Articles by van Genuchten, M. Th. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Mallants, D. Articles by van Genuchten, M. Th. Agricola Articles by Mallants, D. Articles by van Genuchten, M. Th.

Comparison of Three Methods to Calibrate TDR for Monitoring Solute Movement in Undisturbed Soil

Inst. for Land and Water Management, KULeuven, Vital Decosterstraat 102, 3000 Leuven, Belgium

N. Toride

Dep. of Agricultural Sciences, Saga Univ., 840 Saga, Japan

M. Th. van Genuchten

USDA-ARS, U.S. Salinity Lab., 450 W. Big Springs Road, Riverside, CA 92507 CA

*Corresponding author (dirk.mallants{at}agr.kuleuven.ac.be).

ABSTRACT

Time domain reflectometry (TDR) is rapidly becoming a popular method for measuring solute concentrations in the laboratory as well as in the field. Success or failure of TDR to represent solute resident concentrations depends on the accuracy of the invoked calibration. In this study, we compared three commonly used calibration methods that relate the impedance, Z₀ as measured with TDR, to the solute concentration such as the inlet concentration, C₀. The comparison was carried out using solute transport data obtained from 1-m-long, 0.3-m-diam. undisturbed saturated soil columns. The first method comprised the application of a long enough solute pulse such that the concentration in a soil column became equal to the input concentration. The second method involved numerical integration of the observed response to a tracer pulse input function from which Z₀ could be obtained. The third method determined Z₀ using an independently measured relationship between the impedance and the solute concentration. The three calibration methods gave approximately the same results for the first observation depth at x = 0.05 m. However, the presence of heterogeneous transport processes involving solute diffusion from mobile to immobile water regions predicated the use of excessively long solute pulses in order to equilibrate the entire soil column to the input concentration. The first method hence was useful only for the shallower depths. The second method could be applied throughout the soil profile, provided impedance measurements were made for a reasonable time period, especially in the case of nonequilibrium transport. The procedure using an independently measured Z-C relationship underpredicted Z₀ in about 50% of the cases, presumably because of the use of repacked soil in the calibration.

Received for publication March 3, 1995.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Huisman, C. P. Lin, L. Weihermuller, and H. Vereecken Accuracy of Bulk Electrical Conductivity Measurements with Time Domain Reflectometry Vadose Zone J., April 14, 2008; 7(2): 426 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Regalado, A. Ritter, and R. M. Rodriguez-Gonzalez Performance of the Commercial WET Capacitance Sensor as Compared with Time Domain Reflectometry in Volcanic Soils Vadose Zone J., April 9, 2007; 6(2): 244 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Noborio, R. G. Kachanoski, and C. S. Tan Solute Transport Measurement Under Transient Field Conditions Using Time Domain Reflectometry Vadose Zone J., March 8, 2006; 5(1): 412 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gaur, A. Gaur, R. Horton, D. B. Jaynes, J. Lee, and S. A. Al-Jabri Using Surface Time Domain Reflectometry Measurements to Estimate Subsurface Chemical Movement Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 539 - 543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Corwin and S. M. Lesch Application of Soil Electrical Conductivity to Precision Agriculture: Theory, Principles, and Guidelines Agron. J., May 1, 2003; 95(3): 455 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Toride, M. Inoue, and F. J. Leij Hydrodynamic Dispersion in an Unsaturated Dune Sand Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2003; 67(3): 703 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Si and R. G. Kachanoski Measurement of Local Soil Water Flux during Field Solute Transport Experiments Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2003; 67(3): 730 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. P. A. Ferre, D. L. Rudolph, and R. G. Kachanoski The electrical conductivity response of a profiling time-domain reflectometry probe Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2003; 67(2): 494 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Javaux and M. Vanclooster Robust Estimation of the Generalized Solute Transfer Function Parameters Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2003; 67(1): 81 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Nichol, R. Beckie, and L. Smith Evaluation of Uncoated and Coated Time Domain Reflectometry Probes for High Electrical Conductivity Systems Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2002; 66(5): 1454 - 1465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Garrido, M. Ghodrati, C. G. Campbell, and M. Chendorain Detailed Characterization of Solute Transport in a Heterogeneous Field Soil J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2001; 30(2): 573 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lee, R. Horton, and D. B. Jaynes A Time Domain Reflectometry Method to Measure Immobile Water Content and Mass Exchange Coefficient Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2000; 64(6): 1911 - 1917. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. Amente, J. M. Baker, and C. F. Reece Estimation of Soil Solution Electrical Conductivity from Bulk Soil Electrical Conductivity in Sandy Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2000; 64(6): 1931 - 1939. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Vanderborght, A. Timmerman, and J. Feyen Solute Transport for Steady-State and Transient Flow in Soils with and without Macropores Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2000; 64(4): 1305 - 1317. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				H.H. Nissen, P. Moldrup, and R.G. Kachanoski Time Domain Reflectometry Measurements of Solute Transport across a Soil Layer Boundary Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2000; 64(1): 62 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				F. Garrido, M. Ghodrati, M. Chendorain, and C. G. Campbell Small-Scale Variability in Solute Transport Processes in a Homogeneous Clay Loam Soil Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 1999; 63(6): 1513 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Caron, S.B. Jemia, J. Gallichand, and L. Trepanier Field Bromide Transport under Transient-State: Monitoring with Time Domain Reflectometry and Porous Cup Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 1999; 63(6): 1544 - 1553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. S. Das, J. M. Wraith, and W. P. Inskeep Nitrate Concentrations in the Root Zone Estimated Using Time Domain Reflectometry Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 1999; 63(6): 1561 - 1570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.A. Huisman and W. Bouten Comparison of calibration and direct measurement of cable and probe properties in time domain reflectometry Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 1999; 63(6): 1615 - 1617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Nadler, A. Gamliel, and I. Peretz Practical Aspects of Salinity Effect on TDR-Measured Water Content: A Field Study Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 1999; 63(5): 1070 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text]