|
|
||||||||
Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 10717-1303
Dep. of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521
*Corresponding author (yjin{at}pollux.ags.udel.edu).
ABSTRACT
Knowledge of the gaseous diffusion coefficient is necessary to properly model gas movement in porous media. In this study, a nonreactive tracer (freon-12) and a reactive tracer (hexafluorobenzene) were used to evaluate the relationship between the ratio of the gas diffusion coefficient in soil (Dsg) to that in free air (Dag) and the volumetric air content (a) with a two-chamber diffusion system. The measured Dsg/Dag values in our experiments (i.e., the relative gas diffusion coefficients) showed a similar relationship to air content as data obtained from various studies reported in the literature. Our data and values taken from other studies were used to test the validity of various models. When compared with data obtained from experiments with disturbed soils, the Penman model Dsg/Dag = 0.66 a was found to overestimate the measured relative diffusion coefficient, whereas the Millington-Quirk model Dsg/Dag = a10/3/
2, where
is the soil porosity, underestimated it. Another Millington-Quirk relationship Dsg/Dag = a2/
2/3, which has been largely overlooked in the literature, was found to provide significantly better agreement with measured relative diffusion coefficients in various disturbed soils of different texture. On the contrary, no universal relationship was found when data from both disturbed and undisturbed soil experiments were evaluated. The Troeh model Dsg/Dag = [(a – u)/(1 – u)]v had the flexibility to fit all of the experimental data when both of the model parameters were varied simultaneously; however, no obvious correlation was found between soil properties and the parameters. The limitations of any universal form for gas tortuosity model in natural soils were analyzed with percolation theory.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Liu, B. Li, K. Hu, and M. Th. van Genuchten Simulating the Gas Diffusion Coefficient in Macropore Network Images: Influence of Soil Pore Morphology Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 21, 2006; 70(4): 1252 - 1261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Werner, P. Grathwohl, and P. Hohener Review of Field Methods for the Determination of the Tortuosity and Effective Gas-Phase Diffusivity in the Vadose Zone Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2004; 3(4): 1240 - 1248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Moldrup, T. Olesen, S. Yoshikawa, T. Komatsu, and D. E. Rolston Three-Porosity Model for Predicting the Gas Diffusion Coefficient in Undisturbed Soil Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2004; 68(3): 750 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Moldrup, T. Olesen, J. Gamst, P. Schjønning, T. Yamaguchi, and D.E. Rolston Predicting the Gas Diffusion Coefficient in Repacked Soil: Water-Induced Linear Reduction Model Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2000; 64(5): 1588 - 1594. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Weerts, J. I. Freijer, and W. Bouten Modeling the Gas Diffusion Coefficient in Analogy to Electrical Conductivity Using a Capillary Model Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2000; 64(2): 527 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Moldrup, T. Olesen, P. Schjønning, T. Yamaguchi, and D.E. Rolston Predicting the Gas Diffusion Coefficient in Undisturbed Soil from Soil Water Characteristics Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2000; 64(1): 94 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||