SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:1549-1557 (1995)
© 1995 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xu, S.
Right arrow Articles by Harsh, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Xu, S.
Right arrow Articles by Harsh, J. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Xu, S.
Right arrow Articles by Harsh, J. B.

Influence of Autocorrelation and Measurement Errors on Interpretation of Solubility Diagrams

Shihe Xu*

Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824-1325

James B. Harsh

Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The solubility method for determining solid-phase controls on solute activities in aqueous systems is subject to potential sources of misinterpretation. Measurement errors cause deviation of solid-phase solubilities from theoretical values, whereas autocorrelation between dependent and independent variables of a solubility diagram may lead to false interpretation of data points falling on a given solubility line. In this study, a Monte Carlo simulation was performed to determine the influence of measurement errors and autocorrelation on the interpretation of solubility data. For solid-phase control of Al activity at pH <6 for natural gibbsite, basaluminite, and jurbanite, deviation of apparent solubility from theoretical solubility lines of the solids due to measurement errors in pH, total inorganic monomeric Al, ionic strength, and SO4 activity are usually small compared with the deviation expected when random numbers are used to generate a data set. As a result, solid-phase control was distinguishable from autocorrelation of random data except at pH 6 to 7. For a given metal oxide, autocorrelation interference is significant in a solubility study only when the OH/metal ratio of the predominant dissolved metal species is close to the OH/metal or O/Metal ratio of the solid phase. We concluded that the solubility method is a reliable and useful tool to study Al chemistry in acid soils if used with caution.


NOTES

Contribution from the College of Agriculture and Home Economics Research Center, Pullman, WA. Departmental Paper no. 9301-32, Project 0385.

Received for publication June 20, 1994.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. Zysset, P. Blaser, J. Luster, and A.U. Gehring
Aluminum Solubility Control in Different Horizons of a Podzol
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 1999; 63(5): 1106 - 1115.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the Soil Science Society of America.