SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:1520-1524 (1995)
© 1995 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dane, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dane, J. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dane, J. H.

Improved Computational Procedure for Retention Relations of Immiscible Fluids Using Pressure Cells

H. H. Liu and J. H. Dane*

Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849-5412

*Corresponding author (jdane{at}ag.auburn.edu).

ABSTRACT

The capillary pressure-saturation relation, or the capillary pressure head-volumetric fluid content relation, is of widespread interest in modeling and predicting multiphase fluid flow. A common procedure to determine this relation is to use a pressure cell and assume uniform distributions of capillary pressure and volumetric fluid contents at static equilibrium. The pressure cell method, however, yields inaccurate results for certain combinations of multiphase fluids and porous media. The sensitivity analysis in this study shows that the pressure cell height, the positions of the pressure measuring devices, which can coincide with the in- and outflow ports, and the relative density difference of the fluids, can give rise to considerable errors in the determination of capillary pressure head-volumetric fluid content relations by the standard procedure using pressure cells. We, therefore, propose a curve-fitting method that considers nonuniform distributions of capillary pressure and volumetric fluid content of multiphase fluids. The method uses the same input data as commonly used procedures.


NOTES

Contribution from the Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn. as AAES Journal no. 3-944776.

Received for publication September 8, 1994.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
E. Perfect, L. D. McKay, S. C. Cropper, S. G. Driese, G. Kammerer, and J. H. Dane
Capillary Pressure-Saturation Relations for Saprolite: Scaling With and Without Correction for Column Height
Vadose Zone J., May 1, 2004; 3(2): 493 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
S. B. Jones, D. Or, and G. E. Bingham
Gas Diffusion Measurement and Modeling in Coarse-Textured Porous Media
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 602 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
T. K. Tokunaga, T. K. Tokunaga, K. R. Olson, and J. Wan
Moisture Characteristics of Hanford Gravels: Bulk, Grain-Surface, and Intragranular Components
Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2003; 2(3): 322 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. Jalbert and J. H. Dane
Correcting Laboratory Retention Curves for Hydrostatic Fluid Distributions
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2001; 65(3): 648 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the Soil Science Society of America.