HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by López, M. V. Articles by Arrúe, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by López, M. V. Articles by Arrúe, J. L. Agricola Articles by López, M. V. Articles by Arrúe, J. L.

Efficiency of an Incomplete Block Design Based on Geostatistics for Tillage Experiments

Departamento de Edafología, Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Apartado 202, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain

*Corresponding author (jlarrue{at}mizar.csic.es)

ABSTRACT

Spatial dependence of soil properties often reduces the power of conventional statistical methods to detect treatment differences. Control of adverse effects of soil variability is of special interest in long-term experiments when small and slowly developing treatment effects are generally expected to occur, as in tillage research. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of an incomplete block design based on geostatistical concepts to improve the precision of a conservation tillage experiment conducted at four sites in Aragón, northeast Spain. A preliminary geostatistical characterization of plow layer variability at these sites showed that, in most instances, soil water content and silt plus clay content were spatially dependent. Maps of kriged estimates of these properties were used to locate the tillage plots according to the proposed design. Using incomplete blocks of Size 2, the method estimates treatment effects by making short-distance comparisons and ensures spatially balanced treatment contrasts through fixed comparison distances. This design was compared with a complete block design using soil and crop data obtained during the first two growing seasons of the tillage experiment. The results of a total of 1050 analysis of variance comparisons revealed that the incomplete block design was, on average, 24% more efficient than the complete block design. The use of incomplete blocks reduced the average error mean square by 33% and increased the number of cases with significant tillage treatment differences by 25% compared with the use of complete blocks.

Received for publication April 8, 1994.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Perfect and J. Caron Spectral Analysis of Tillage-Induced Differences in Soil Spatial Variability Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2002; 66(5): 1587 - 1595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]