SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:939-945 (1995)
© 1995 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kludze, H. K.
Right arrow Articles by DeLaune, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kludze, H. K.
Right arrow Articles by DeLaune, R. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kludze, H. K.
Right arrow Articles by DeLaune, R. D.

Gaseous Exchange and Wetland Plant Response to Soil Redox Intensity and Capacity

H. K. Kludze*

IRRI, P.O. Box 933, 1099 Manila, Philippines

R. D. DeLaune

Wetland Biogeochemistry Inst., Center for Coastal, Energy and Environmental Resources, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803-7511

*Corresponding author (hkludze{at}irri.cgnet.com).

ABSTRACT

Although reports on plant responses to wetland conditions abound, limited information is available to relate such responses to well-defined soil redox conditions. Laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate differences in plant response to soil redox intensity (Eh) and capacity. Mississippi floodplain soil (Mhoon; fine-silty, mixed, nonacid, thermic Typic Fluvaquent) and rice paddy soil (Crowley; fine, montmorillonitic, thermic Typic Albaqualf) were used to grow saltmeadow cordgrass [Spartina patens (Aiton) Muhlenb.] and rice (Oryza sativa L.), respectively. Plants were grown under controlled Eh levels of 100, 0, –100, and –200 mV to examine the effect of Eh on CO2 fixation. Treatments for the soil redox capacity experiment were imposed by application of different levels of extra energy source while maintaining Eh at -200 mV. Redox capacity effects on plant growth, CO2 fixation, root porosity (POR), radial oxygen loss (ROL), and CH4 emissions were also evaluated. In both test plants, CO2 fixation did not respond to soil Eh until –100 mV. Although POR was unaffected, plant growth, CO2 fixation, and CH4 emissions were significantly decreased with increase in soil O2 demand, thus suggesting a complex relationship between soil redox capacity and plant physiological functions. Plant O2 transport to the root environment (ROL) was also governed by soil redox capacity. Results indicate that plants may respond differently in magnitude to soil redox intensity and redox capacity. Evaluating responses, especially ROL, of flood-tolerant plant species therefore requires proper quantification of the soil redox condition or substrate O2 demand in which the plants are grown.


NOTES

This study was conducted at Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA. Funding for this research was provided by the National Institute for Global Environmental Change (funded by the Department of Energy).

Received for publication May 23, 1994.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the Soil Science Society of America.