SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:509-519 (1995)
© 1995 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammer, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Barney, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hammer, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Barney, T. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hammer, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Barney, T. L.

Slope Class Maps from Soil Survey and Digital Elevation Models

R. D. Hammer* and F. J. Young

Dep. of Soil and Atmospheric Sciences

T. W. Haithcoate

Dep. of Geography, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211

N. C. Wollenhaupt

Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1298

T. L. Barney

USDA-SCS, Columbia, MO 65203

* Corresponding author ( snrdaveh{at}mizzoul.missouri.edu).

ABSTRACT

Special-purpose land use maps based on slope attributes from digital elevation models (DEMs) often are produced with geographic information system technology. Field verification is lacking for accuracy and precision of computer-generated slope class maps from 10- and 30-m DEMs, a standard USDA (1:24 000) soil survey, and field-measured slopes. Two 16-ha sites in Atchison County, Missouri, were selected, flagged on 10-m grids, and the slope was field measured for each grid cell. The field-measured slope class maps were templates for cell-by-cell comparisons with the computer-generated slope classes. More than 50% of the areas were classified into correct slope classes with 10-m DEM maps. The 30-m DEM maps were 30 and 21% correctly classified in the two study areas. Two iterations of low-pass filters increased the accuracy of the 10-m derived maps, but decreased the accuracy of one 30-m derived map. Soil survey techniques correctly classified >30% of each area, but did not capture landscape heterogeneity. The GIS-produced maps underestimated slopes on convexities and overestimated slopes on concavities. Slope class maps from 10-m DEMs have potential use for soil survey and land use planning.

Received for publication January 12, 1994.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. D. Tomer and D. E. James
Do Soil Surveys and Terrain Analyses Identify Similar Priority Sites for Conservation?
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2004; 68(6): 1905 - 1915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
F.J. Young and R.D. Hammer
Defining Geographic Soil Bodies by Landscape Position, Soil Taxonomy, and Cluster Analysis
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2000; 64(3): 989 - 998.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the Soil Science Society of America.