| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Precision Moisture Instruments Inc., 100-4243 Glanford Ave., Victoria, BC, Canada V8Z 4B9
Dep. of Biology, Univ. of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 2Y2
* Corresponding author ( njl{at}uvvm.uvic.ca).
ABSTRACT
The determination of soil water content by time domain reflectometry (TDR) involves two steps: the measurement of the propagation velocity of an electromagnetic pulse along a transmission line and the conversion of this measurement to an estimate of soil water content. The objective of this study was to identify and quantify errors associated with propagation velocity measurements. We developed new TDR techniques, involving the use of remotely switched diodes and differential wave form detection, that can be used to quantify and minimize propagation velocity errors. These errors are presented in terms of time interval errors. We show that the dominant time interval error term relates to the transition time of reflected pulses and that absolute time interval errors cannot be assumed to be <200 ps. We identify the presence of dissolved ions and the use of long cables as major sources of additional transition time errors. For transition times >2 ns, the time interval error caused by transition time effects can be estimated as the root mean square sum of the basic 200-ps error and an error equal to 10% of the transition time. We show that although instrument time base errors are the main source of precision errors, they are less important in determining the absolute accuracy of propagation velocity measurements. We show that system costs can be reduced without compromising accuracy by using 75 
coaxial cable, which is not only inexpensive but is superior to standard 50 cable.
Received for publication February 2, 1994.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  W. R. Hook, T. P. A. Ferre, and N. J. Livingston The Effects of Salinity on the Accuracy and Uncertainty of Water Content Measurement Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2004; 68(1): 47 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A. Robinson, D. A. Robinson, S. B. Jones, J. M. Wraith, D. Or, and S. P. Friedman A Review of Advances in Dielectric and Electrical Conductivity Measurement in Soils Using Time Domain Reflectometry Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 444 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. C. Harlow, R. C. Harlow, E. J. Burke, and T. P. A. Ferre Measuring Water Content in Saline Sands Using Impulse Time Domain Transmission Techniques Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2003; 2(3): 433 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-P. Lin Frequency Domain Versus Travel Time Analyses of TDR Waveforms for Soil Moisture Measurements Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2003; 67(3): 720 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. C. Heathman, P. J. Starks, and M. A. Brown Time Domain Reflectometry Field Calibration in the Little Washita River Experimental Watershed Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2003; 67(1): 52 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.D. Logsdon Effect of Cable Length on Time Domain Reflectometry Calibration for High Surface Area Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2000; 64(1): 54 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Nadler, A. Gamliel, and I. Peretz Practical Aspects of Salinity Effect on TDR-Measured Water Content: A Field Study Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 1999; 63(5): 1070 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Vadose Zone Journal | Journal of Plant Registrations | ||||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Journal of Environmental Quality |
||||
