SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1624-1627 (1994)
© 1994 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berigari, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Al-Any, F. M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Berigari, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Al-Any, F. M. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Berigari, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Al-Any, F. M. S.

Gypsum Determination in Soils by Conversion to Water-Soluble Sodium Sulfate

M. S. Berigari*

11449 S. St. Louis, Ave., Chicago, IL 60655

F. M. S. Al-Any

Talib M. Sa'id & Brothers Co., Jordan Square, Baghdad, Iraq

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Precise and accurate determination of gypsum in soils has been difficult by the wet-chemical methods, based on its solubility in water. In this work, 2-g samples of three Typic Gypsiorthids were washed once with 25-mL portions of 50% (v/v) ethanol to selectively remove nongypsic soluble sulfates. Soil gypsum was subsequently converted to CaCO3(s) and Na2SO4 by ultrasonic dispersion of the samples twice with 25-mL increments of 0.5 M Na2CO3 solution. The SO2–4 in the supernatant solution was centrifuge separated and analyzed by the standard gravimetric BaSO4 (A) and turbidimetric (B) methods to obtain the gypsum content of the samples. The agreement between the data of Methods A and B was excellent where the best-fitted regression line coincided with the 1:1 line in a scattergram. Soil gypsum was also extracted with water, then determined by turbidimetric SO2–4 (C) and the Bower-Huss conductometric (D) methods for comparison. Statistical analyses of the data showed higher values (P = 0.05) of gypsum in soils obtained by the proposed method than by water extraction even when the same method of SO2–4 analysis was applied. The efficiency of the proposed method was 25 to 31 times greater than that achieved by water. The proposed method of gypsum extraction and its determination in soils from turbidimetric SO2–4 analysis was applied. The efficiency of the proposed method was 25 to 31 times greater than that acheived by water. The proposed method of gypsum extraction and its determination in soils from turibidimetric SO2–4 analysis is simple, rapid, and quite accurate for soil taxonomy, land reclamation, and other engineering purposes.

Received for publication December 4, 1989.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1994 by the Soil Science Society of America.