SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1555-1561 (1994)
© 1994 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burcar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burcar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, S. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Burcar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, S. W.

Seasonal Preferential Flow in Two Sierra Nevada Soils under Forested and Meadow Cover

S. Burcar, W. W. Miller* and D. W. Johnson

Dep. of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, NV 89512

S. W. Tyler

Desert Res. Inst., Reno, NV

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The preferential movement of surface-applied solutes is a potential source of groundwater contamination and could subsequently provide a major source of nutrients to Lake Tahoe. This study investigated seasonal infiltration, water repellency, and preferential water flow in two Sierra Nevada soil types (a granitic and a volcanic soil) in forest and meadow areas using a rainfall simulator. Infiltration and runoff were measured at the plot surface. Plots were subsequently excavated to measure preferential water flow. Water repellency was found to affect infiltration and nonuniform preferential flow was observed. The volcanic soil demonstrated continuous preferential flow with depth, whereas in the granitic soil, preferential flow rapidly dissipated. Wetting patterns showed greater preferential flow in the forested areas for both soils compared with the meadow areas. Higher initial water content and reduced water repellency in the early spring generally produced more typical matrix water flow in the coarser textured granitic soil. Since preferencial flow was most evident in all forested conditions, nutrient bypass potential is considered greatest on soils in forested areas near tributaries and the lake.


NOTES

A contribution of the Nevada Agric. Exp. Stn.; the Hydrology/Hydrogeology Program, College of Agriculture, Univ. of Nevada, Reno; and the State Water Resources Inst., Reno, NV. Grant no. 656.

Received for publication January 4, 1994.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
Z. Wang, A. Tuli, and W. A. Jury
Unstable Flow during Redistribution in Homogeneous Soil
Vadose Zone J., February 1, 2003; 2(1): 52 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
P.D. Hallett, T. Baumgartl, and I.M. Young
Subcritical Water Repellency of Aggregates from a Range of Soil Management Practices
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2001; 65(1): 184 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M.L.K. Carrillo, J. Letey, and S.R. Yates
Unstable Water Flow in a Layered Soil: I. Effects of a Stable Water-Repellent Layer
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2000; 64(2): 450 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1994 by the Soil Science Society of America.