SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:1283-1288 (1993)
© 1993 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giesler, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lundström, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Giesler, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lundström, U.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Giesler, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lundström, U.

Soil Solution Chemistry: Effects of Bulking Soil Samples

R. Giesler* and U. Lundström

Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Dep. of Forest Ecology, Soil Science Section, S-901 83 Umeå, Sweden

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Bulking of soil samples is commonly used to obtain a spatially averaged measure of soil properties. This study investigated whether bulking can affect the chemistry of soil solution extracted by the centrifuge drainage technique. The short-range variation within a 1-m-wide pit face was also investigated. Systematic differences were found between the chemistry of soil solutions taken from bulked and unbulked soil samples. The soil samples studied were taken on several occasions from the upper and lower part of a Bs horizon. Samples of soil solution extracted from replicate bulked soil samples contained significantly (P ≤ 0.05) larger amounts of Si, Na, Mg, and K as well as significantly (P ≤ 0.05) smaller amounts of Al and Fe than soil solution from unbulked samples. Bulking reduced the variation in all solutes measured, although a variation remained in replicates from the bulked sample. The variation between individual core samples taken just a few tens of centimeters apart can be considerable, although the magnitude of variation differs depending on the solute studied. The results suggest that unbulked soil samples may be preferable, especially when Al or Fe chemistry is studied and a centrifuge drainage technique is used.


NOTES

Contribution from Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, contract no. Dnr 802-761-91-Fs.

Received for publication May 26, 1992.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1993 by the Soil Science Society of America.