SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:1228-1234 (1993)
© 1993 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duquette, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hendershot, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Duquette, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hendershot, W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Duquette, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hendershot, W.

Soil Surface Charge Evaluation by Back-titration: II. Application

Martin Duquette

SNC-Lavalin Environment Inc., 2, Place Felix-Martin, Montreal, QC, H2Z 1Z3, Canada

William Hendershot*

Dep. of Renewable Resources, McGill Univ., Macdonald Campus, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, H9X 3V9, Canada

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Measurement of net surface charge by potentiometric titration and ion adsorption methods often gives different estimates of pH-dependent exchange capacity. One of the major problems has been that potentiometric titration measures the H+ or OH consumption due to surface reactions as well as those associated with dissolution of the soil and hydrolysis of ions in solution. In general, potentiometric titration has overestimated pH-dependent exchange capacity, compared with ion adsorption methods. The backtitration procedure presented here corrects for these errors by performing two titrations. After slowly titrating the soil sample, suspended in 0.1 M Ca(NO3)2, to pH 3, the suspension is either titrated with 0.005 M Ca(OH)2 or centrifuged and the supernatant alone titrated. By subtracting the amount of OH required to titrate the supernatant from the amount required to titrate the soil-solution suspension, the net OH consumption is calculated. If a value for pH-independent CEC is known, then the pH-dependent surface charge curve can be adjusted to give results that correspond closely to those obtained by ion adsorption. The proposed method is simpler and more rapid than the ion adsorption procedures. The inflection points on the titration curve can also be correlated with the chemical composition of the soil. Preliminary results suggest that the pH-dependent CEC curve can be predicted from knowledge of organic matter content and various forms of amorphous Fe and Al.

Received for publication May 1, 1992.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
Y. Ge and W. Hendershot
Evaluation of Soil Surface Charge Using the Back-Titration Technique
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2004; 68(1): 82 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1993 by the Soil Science Society of America.