| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Dep. of Soil Science
Centre for Computing and Biometrics, Lincoln Univ., Canterbury, New Zealand
*Corresponding author.
ABSTRACT
We investigated a relatively unexplored area of soil science: the fitting of parameterized models to particle-size distribution (a subject more thoroughly explored in sedimentology). Comparative fitting of different models requires the use of statistical indices enabling rational selection of an optimum model, i.e., a model that balances the improvement in fit often achieved by increasing the number of parameters, p, against model simplicity retained by minimizing p. Five models were tested on cumulative mass-size data for 71 texturally diverse New Zealand soils: a one-parameter (p = 1) Jaky model borrowed from geotechnics; the standard lognormal model (p = 2); two modified lognormal models (each with p = 3); and the bimodal lognormal model (p = 3). The Jaky and modified lognormal models have not previously been introduced into the soil science literature. Three statistical comparators were used: the coefficient of determination, R2; the F statistic; and the Cp statistic of Mallows. The bimodal model and one modified lognormal model (denoted ORL) best fit the data. The bimodal model gave a marginally better fit, but incorporates a sub-clay mode (untestable with the present data), so we adopted the ORL model as the physically best benchmark for comparison of other models. The simple Jaky one-parameter model gave a good fit to data for many of the soils, better than the standard lognormal model for 23 soils. The model comparison methods described have potential utility in other areas of soil science. The Cp statistic is advocated as the best statistic for model selection.
Received for publication August 27, 1991.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. R. Bah, O. Kravchuk, and G. Kirchhof Fitting Performance of Particle-size Distribution Models on Data Derived by Conventional and Laser Diffraction Techniques Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 13, 2009; 73(4): 1101 - 1107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Martin, C. Garcia-Gutierrez, and M. Reyes Modeling Multifractal Features of Soil Particle Size Distributions with Kolmogorov Fragmentation Algorithms Vadose Zone J., March 5, 2009; 8(1): 202 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. P. Chan and R. S. Govindaraju Estimating Soil Water Retention Curve from Particle-Size Distribution Data Based on Polydisperse Sphere Systems Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2004; 3(4): 1443 - 1454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. I. Hwang and S. E. Powers Using Particle-Size Distribution Models to Estimate Soil Hydraulic Properties Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2003; 67(4): 1103 - 1112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. I. Hwang, K. P. Lee, D. S. Lee, and S. E. Powers Models for Estimating Soil Particle-Size Distributions Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2002; 66(4): 1143 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. N. D. Posadas, D. Gimenez, M. Bittelli, C. M. P. Vaz, and M. Flury Multifractal Characterization of Soil Particle-Size Distributions Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2001; 65(5): 1361 - 1367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Bittelli, G. S. Campbell, and M. Flury Characterization of Particle-Size Distribution in Soils with a Fragmentation Model Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 1999; 63(4): 782 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||
