SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:300-306 (1993)
© 1993 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shepard, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shepard, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shepard, J. S.

Using a Fractal Model to Compute the Hydraulic Conductivity Function

J. Scott Shepard*

Dep. of Land, Air, and Water Resources, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Because it is easier and faster to determine the soil water retention curve than the hydraulic conductivity function, it would be desirable to have a method for calculating the latter from the former. A physically based relationship between conductivity and retention would, if correct, shed light on the status and movement of water in the soil. A method for calculating the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soil from moisture retention data and a fractal description of soil water flow paths was derived. The fractal model was a triadic Koch curve with segment lengths equal to twice the capillary radius, which was equivalent to the matric potential of selected points on the retention curve. The total length of the water flow path at the different pressures was determined by the total length of the fractal curve. This means that the path length increases as the matric potential increases in magnitude. Published data were used to determine average measured retention curves and hydraulic conductivity functions for three soil types: sand, loam, and clay. The calculated hydraulic conductivities approximated the measured conductivities at all water contents for all soil types.

Received for publication August 27, 1991.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. M. Arya, D. C. Bowman, B. B. Thapa, and D. K. Cassel
Scaling Soil Water Characteristics of Golf Course and Athletic Field Sands from Particle-Size Distribution
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 11, 2008; 72(1): 25 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
V.Y. Chertkov and I. Ravina
Tortuosity of Crack Networks in Swelling Clay Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 1999; 63(6): 1523 - 1530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
M. B. Clennell
Tortuosity: a guide through the maze
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1997; 122(1): 299 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1993 by the Soil Science Society of America.