SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1127-1129 (1992)
© 1992 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Munk, L. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Munk, L. P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Munk, L. P.

Sodium Adsorption Ratio Screening Procedure for Soils Using pH and Electrical Conductivity

Lewis P. Munk*

Dep. of Land, Air, and Water Resources, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Soils with sodium adsorption ratios (SAR) <10 are generally considered to be below the threshold for potential Na hazard. The impetus for developing this screening procedure was to reduce the resources dedicated to determining precise SAR values in situations when simply knowing that the SAR is below the designated threshold is sufficient. The model was developed using 1000 samples and validated on a 24 000-sample data set from two different laboratories operating in the western USA. The screening procedure uses empirically derived combinations of saturated soil paste pH (pHs) and extract electrical conductivity (ECe) to predict if the SAR is above or below 10, or whether Ca + Mg and Na must be analyzed to determine the SAR. For some combinations of pHs and ECe, the ratio of Ca + Mg to estimated total cations [ETC = ECe(10)] is used to decide whether Na must be analyzed. On average, the model incorrectly predicted that the SAR was <10 when the actual value was > 10 in only six out of 1000 samples. In addition, about 20% of the samples required Ca + Mg and Na analyses when the SAR was < 10. For the data sets tested, the screening procedure could have reduced the number of Ca + Mg and Na analyses by 50% with little loss of information about the potential Na hazard of the soils.


NOTES

Contribution of the Dep. of Land, Air, and Water Resources and U.S. Dep. of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Natural Resources and Engineering Lab.

Received for publication August 12, 1991.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1992 by the Soil Science Society of America.