SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1036-1042 (1992)
© 1992 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by van Genuchten, M. Th.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by van Genuchten, M. Th.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by van Genuchten, M. Th.

Shrinkage of Bare and Cultivated Soil

Alan R. Mitchell*

Oregon State University, Central Oregon Agricultural Research Center, 850 NW Dogwood Lane, Madras, OR 97741

M. Th. van Genuchten

USDA-ARS, U.S. Salinity Laboratory, 4500 Glenwood Dr., Riverside, CA 92501

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The surface subsidence of shrink-swell soils may be used to estimate the soil profile water content and soil behaving. Roots are known to affect cracking patterns by anchoring the soil mass, thus influencing soil shrinkage. Our hypothesis was that plant roots will influence soil shrinkage measured by vertical surface subsidence. We tested this hypothesis by measuring shrinkage in a large weighing lysimeter for bare soil with no root system and for soils under wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) crops possessing fibrous and tap root systems, respectively. The volume-loss shrinkage curves for both bare and cultivated soil were found to conform to the straight-lines model, with distinct changes in shrinkage zones, in spite of uneven water-content distributions in the profile. The shrinkage characteristic (i.e., the differential change in bulk volume divided by the change in volume water) was greater for fallow (0.677) than for wheat (0.380) and alfalfa (0.377), with the cultivated conditions being similar. These data suggest that plant roots may have large effects on in situ soil shrinkage rates and the water-content zones throughout which they occur. This result means that a soil's shrinkage characteristic may change depending on the cropping condition. It also means that shrinkage measurements from soils without rooting systems (e.g., small cores or clods) are not necessarily representative of actual shrinkage properties observed in the field.


NOTES

Contribution of the USDA-ARS, U.S. Salinity Laboratory.

Received for publication January 16, 1991.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1992 by the Soil Science Society of America.